Essay On Burning Persepolis

698 Words2 Pages

The biggest lies in the history u should know about Iran History is a science, like all sciences and it has precise rules and formulas. Lack of attention to historical writings, will make fake stories; but an expert with simple analysis will find out that he can’t use those fake stories as resources or knowledge of history. One of those lies is Alexander fake attack on Iran! The processors of Alexander’s story that made his story about six hundred years after his death, they never kept this in their mind that the first factor of the victory in wars are the number of warriors and weapons of war and experienced commanders in the war. We can’t say to the world what to write and what to not write! But at least we can check and research about …show more content…

So he could never stand and destroy the great empire of Iran. Burning the Persepolis by Alexander was another big lie in the history that made by Iran’s enemies. In fact Persepolis was never burnt. The writers who wrote about burning Persepolis didn’t have any knowledge about Persepolis and said that the palace was made by Cedar’s wood; but it’s not true coz the Persepolis made by strong stones and its totally rejected scientifically. Limestone, calcium carbonate that was the basic material in Persepolis building, under 1 atmospheric pressure, in the heat of 894 degrees with the 391 calories of heat, can burn and disintegrate. So with these facts about Persepolis’s materials any unskillful person can understand that burning Persepolis was just a fake story. Some burnt clothes, carpets and objects that found in Persepolis, are not belong to that period. All over the history and the last hundred years, rulers, tourists, nomads and shepherds were using that place and some of those stuffs are for them. Treasure hunters over time and specially Jewish colonization factors that were entering as historian to the Persepolis were some of the other reasons for the burnt stuffs in

Open Document