Essay Comparing Lord Of The Flies And Animal Farm

419 Words1 Page

As Aung San Suu Kyi once said, “It is not power that corrupts but fear. Fear of losing power corrupts those who wield it and fear of the scourge of power corrupts those who are subject to it.” This quote emphasizes that desire of power comes with fear. Fear is able to destroy a functioning utopian ideal and turn it into a dystopian nightmare. With that idea, it can also destroy the person who desires power itself. Power means complete dominance over society. When power makes itself know to an individual it leads him to become greedy and selfish, it leads the person to feel unsatisfied about the amount of the power that he already possesses,causing him to want more of it. That one person can lead a dream of freedom and security, a utopian ideal, …show more content…

The two novels had an intelligent character, who wanted to develop a fair and resourceful society where everyone is seen as equal, and an egotistical character, who was aiming towards superiority and complete control. In Lord of the Flies the reasonable person, Ralph, was the leader and the one who tries to push the boys, that had arrived at the mysterious island, towards a functional society that offers what a utopian ideal states. Jack, on the other hand, is the individual who desired more power than any other on the island. He used the beast as a threat to the boys, which led them to get afraid and follow Jack in order to survive the beast's wrath. This lead to a complete fall of the society into dystopia. Animal Farm has the same outline as Lord of the Flies. Animal Farm dealt with a clever pig, Snowball, who just thought of ideas to improve the farm that the animals created, he did not want superiority, but he was liked by many of the farm animals which was a threat to the pig who wanted to be the most powerful one, Nepolean. Napoleon often used the one thing the animals were afraid of, humans, as a way for them to listen and obey his

Open Document