Erving Goffman

1486 Words3 Pages

Introduction

The social theorist I chose for this paper is symbolic interactionist Erving Goffman. I chose Erving Goffman because of his intellectual and still relevant research on social behaviour and learning among individuals. He is one of a few social theorists whom I find completely interesting and noteworthy. Not only this, but I found that I wanted to learn more about him and soak in all of his ideas and his work because he is from Canada. I am a very proud Canadian and I am glad that such an influential social theorist whose work is still being put to use today came from the country that I am from. This paper will outline most, if not all, of Goffman’ss most important aspects to social life by providing you with his biography, his ideas, and how his ideas relate to the now, the twenty-first century. → ADD
Biography

Erving Manual Goffman was born in Mannville, Alberta, Canada on June 11, 1922 to Max and Ann, his immigrant Ukrainian Jewish parents along with his sister Frances. In 1937 Goffman attended St. John’s Technical High School. Goffman had much education and initially attended at the University of Manitoba for his interest in chemistry in 1939. After this period of his life, he worked at the National Film Board in Ottawa, Ontario where he met one of his mentors Dennis Wong who spiked Goffman’s interest in the study of sociology. This is when Goffman enrolled at the University of Toronto where he studied sociology and anthropology (Fine & Manning, 2003, p.35). Goffman graduated with his undergraduate sociology degree in 1945 from the University of Toronto and proceeded to pursue his graduate studies at the University of Chicago (Dillon, 2010, p. 266).
The transition for Goffman was very difficult and overwhelmi...

... middle of paper ...

...d a study at the St. Elizabeth’s mental hospital and found this to be a very harsh institution. Goffman found that “the total institution had accomplished its mission to be a “forcing house” for changing persons .. both the mortification of self and the privilege system undermined the patients’ sense of self (Fine & Manning, 2003, p.50). This is stating that St. Elizabeth’s was a place where the patients who were there had no choice but to change while taking away and undermining the patient’s individuality. “The total institution is able to mount an attack on the person’s self-conception, the sense that we have of who we “really” are (Fine & Manning, 2003, p.50).
While this paper cannot focus on all of Goffman’s ideas, he had many more noteworthy ideas including his very influential work on stigma, passing, language and the institutional frame analysis.
Relevance

Open Document