Ernest Moncrieff

1214 Words3 Pages

In Oscar Wilde’s play The Importance of Being Earnest, names hold a certain social significance. For example, the first name Ernest bears an arbitrary importance, at least in regards to the bachelorettes of the play. However, neither Jack nor Algernon was christened with this name, so, naturally, they masquerade as the imaginary character who owns the name in order to win the affections of the local bachelorettes. This act is surface level and merely changes the nomenclature of a body. Jack, in particular, has everything to gain from a union with the well-connected Gwendolyn, including all the benefits that come from being tied to a wealthy, established family. Jack’s lack of familial and social ties can be remedied through baptism and marriage, …show more content…

Just as Jack Worthing’s existence is circumstantial, his true identity, Ernest Moncrieff, arises from happenstance. Through the action of Act III, which enlightens the bizarre events of Jack’s “birth” from a handbag in a coatroom, Jack gradually takes on the trimmings of the well-connected and desirable Ernest Moncrieff. Jack Worthing no longer requires the trappings of an established family, such as respectable names, which arise from the sacraments of strategic and extravagant marriage and baptism. As Miss Prism points out, Lady Bracknell is best able to reveal Jack’s identity, and, his true family connections and name (53). After explaining that Jack is the eldest son of the Moncrieff family, Lady Bracknell remembers that Jack was indeed christened as his father’s namesake. Citing the relevant military directory, Jack discovers his father was indeed Ernest (54). With this revelation, Jack claims his position as a member of the wealthy, respected Moncrieff family, without a marriage or baptism. Because his Christian and family names now hold social relevance, he no longer has to resort to the manipulation of church institutions in order to meet these collective requirements. This sequence further displays Wilde’s insistence that the imposed social value associated with names relies only on circumstance and is far from substantial evidence of

Open Document