Erasure By Percival Everett: Character Analysis

664 Words2 Pages

The novel Erasure by Percival Everett explores the development of writer Monk Ellison as well as the frame tale Monk sells. After writing My Pafology, Monk continues to struggle with his sister’s death, his mother’s deteriorating health, and the growing sense that he has “sold out”. Monk writes about story ideas, his feelings on art form, and flashbacks to when his father was alive or when he was an adolescent. Through these vignettes of Monk’s thoughts, separated by three ominous X’s, we find not only the extreme intelligence that he has, but also the sadness and isolation his “uniqueness” has brought him. Specifically, he ruins his relationship with Marilyn by criticizing how the book We’s Lives in da Ghetto was on her nightstand, the book …show more content…

Apropos de Bottes, the title of the story meaning ‘without reason or rhythm’, gives the story its central theme and an air of absurdum. The characters and situation are so hilariously extreme that the politics and meaning of the story are more clear; perhaps a backlash from Monk who assumed that everyone would know My Pafology was a parody and yet received a substantial amount of money for it to be published “seriously”. The questions and answers that Tom and the other contestant on Virtue et Amis, are both so ridiculous that the reader follows Tom’s reactions to the absurdity. Tom, an African American man, answers extremely difficult and obscure questions with ease while Mr. Dullard, a white man, receives particularly easy questions and answers them wrongly. Also, before the show, Tom was shown into the Make-up department and had essentially a black-face put on him, as he was not “black” enough to be on Virtue et Amis. When Tom notes how he looks like a clown, the make up artist says “Rules are rules. You wouldn’t want to confuse the folks viewing at home, now would you?” (174). These notable examples of the racism Tom feels seems to signify Monk wrapping his mind over race as a social construct. He, as Tom does, does not understand why everything for him has to constantly be about race and stereotypes. Growing up, Monk felt that he was always on the outside, not black enough to understand ‘slang’ or Black-culture. He felt confused when his books would be rejected for not being Black

Open Document