Enteral Nutrition Case Study

1057 Words3 Pages

Jerry Huang, a male patient underwent a surgical procedure for an inflammatory intestinal disease. A small part of his intestine was removed, and he was on total parenteral nutrition before surgery; he continued on TPN after surgery for about ten days; then, he started on enteral nutrition which delivered very small feedings (DeBruyne & Pinna, 2012).

This patient was obviously too sick to eat food by mouth to provide the energy for the body to work. However, this illness interfere with this patient digestion and absorption of nutrient, and that is one reason why this person was on TPN (DeBruyne & Pinna, 2012). Long term parenteral nutrition was required prior to surgery and then after the surgery (DeBruyne & Pinna, 2012). This person requirement …show more content…

Enteral feeding are preferred over parenteral feeding because it causes less complications; most importantly it costs less money and it can be used for a longer period (DeBruyne & Pinna, 2012). If a person has a poor intake of food, then he can have bolus enteral feeding to help maintain and he can get the nutrients he needs to sustain a healthy lifestyle.
This health care team have to make sure that this patient have normal GI functioning, and they have to make sure that this resident pass gas or they can check for bowel sounds to make sure that this person is ready to make the transition before he can start enteral feeding (DeBruyne & Pinna, 2012). As soon as this person starts with oral feeding, Clear liquid diet will be given first, then gradually the intestine will able to accept solid food. Once the patient is able to consume enough nutrients, then parenteral feeding will be discontinued (DeBruyne & Pinna, …show more content…

A person who has a G- tube can have a normal lifestyle so as an individual with a nasogastric tube. Medical personnel will teach people on how to replace a g-tube or nasogastric tube (DeBruyne & Pinna, 2012). G- tube bolus feedings are the easiest and simplest way. However, for intermittent feeding; it is a little different. The delivery rate is slower, and it runs for a longer period, and sometime the insurance company will not pay for the formulas (DeBruyne & Pinna,

More about Enteral Nutrition Case Study

Open Document