Endangered Species: Delisting Grizzly Bear

1132 Words3 Pages

However, the overall goal of the ESA is to move endangered species off the list once their population reaches the proposed numbers. Delisting grizzly bears is a matter of maintaining the “integrity” (Rinella, 2016) of the Endangered Species Act. Many organizations, including the National Wildlife Federation, are defending the delisting “so long as adequate plans exist to assure recovery continues” (NWF, 2016). The National Wildlife Foundation has been working diligently on the rehabilitation of habitats and the recovery of the grizzly population, but would like to the see them taken off the list. This sounds contradictory but it is because the NWF believes that a success story of this magnitude can only be continued with the delisting as an …show more content…

Willcox is a grizzly bear activist who resides in Montana, one of the main states in conflict on the delisting. She believes that the delisting of the Grizzly Bear brought on by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is simply to appease those in opposition of the ESA and preserve its integrity. Although, Willcox points out that delisting of previous animals did not increase the overall tolerance of the ESA by those who oppose it. Additionally, the money currently being spent on the grizzly bears would not go to the bears if they are delisted. “Funding saved on Yellowstone bears would most likely go to the next court-ordered item on the list.” (Willcox, 2016) This means that if delisted, states will have to fund their own enforcement methods and research if they implement laws to conserve grizzly habitats and …show more content…

Fish and Wildlife Service, but the best way to do so is through the American people. “A majority of Americans oppose what the agency and states are trying to do, according to a national poll in April commissioned by The HSUS and Wyoming Wildlife Advocates: 55 percent of those asked opposed delisting”. (Lange, 2016) This means that the opportunity to bring up the delisting at press conferences can push more attention to the issue. Once the American people show they are opposed to the delisting, congress will follow suit. Most conservatives who oppose the ESA will likely be forced to agree with keeping the grizzly bears listed as endangered species to ensure their approval rating for reelection. Decisions based on uncertainty can cause unintended consequences, and that outcome alone is enough to realize that delisting is not the answer. Continuing to protect the grizzly bears is the safest and most logical decision to ensure the continued success of the

More about Endangered Species: Delisting Grizzly Bear

Open Document