End Homelessness Case Study

1700 Words4 Pages

Introduction Homelessness has not always been such a substantial issue. Homelessness “did not emerge until the 1980s” (Stergiopoulos et al., 2016, p.1). “There are between 700,000 to 800,000 people that are homeless on any given night” (Stergiopoulos et al., 2016, p.4). This issue has many involving factors; the following discussion will answer the question created by Open Arms Ministry of are there examples of effective programs, coalition, cities, communities that eliminate or attempted to eliminate homelessness? To prepare, there will be a definition of homelessness, new homelessness, usual care and a description of the issue of homelessness. This will be continued by the discussion of effective strategies that have helped end homelessness …show more content…

A plan for outcome consists of gathering information about the group they are attempting to serve (National Alliance to End Homelessness, 2006, p.11). Such information includes who is homeless, why they are homeless, what services are they receiving and their needs (National Alliance to End Homelessness, 2006, p.12). Planning involves utilizing existing funds, apply for funds and develop long term plans to achieve the goal (National Alliance to End Homelessness, 2006, p.12). Closing the front door is finding effective strategies to prevent homelessness (National Alliance to End Homelessness, 2006, p.13). Some those programs are Temporary assistance for needy families, mental health performance partnership block grants, social services block grant, and community health centers (National Alliance to End Homelessness, 2006, p.13). The problem is that the homelessness receive assistance and are housed but soon after another individual or family is replacing the previous homeless person’s place (National Alliance to End Homelessness, 2006, p.13). Open the back-door is rapidly re-housing the individual or family that became homeless (National Alliance to End Homelessness, 2006, p.15). However, not only re-housing them but providing with appropriate services and support. Finally, building infrastructure is advocating for affordable housing and …show more content…

It provides an affordable home and allows people to live in a better quality of life. Another element that’s makes a program successful is offering other services such as supportive services and health services for mental illness (Guerrero, Henwood, & Wenzel, 2014 National Alliance to End Homelessness, 2006; Stergiopoulos et al., 2016). It has been proven that SUB intervention illustrated the best outcome compared to the PBTH, CBRR, and UC interventions. It is successful because it offers a long-term housing subsidy. Overall, to provide an effective program, it must offer a long-term housing subsidy and supportive

Open Document