Emperor And Pope Similarities

778 Words2 Pages

The emperor and the pope were both at the top of their respected social hierarchy, as figure heads. Whist both the emperor and pope were the figure heads in their class the power that the held was minor they could be known as a nominal leader. This was different to the high expectations that the public thought, they held high and lots of power, but the option or choice to use it was minimal. This choice was normal to most figure heads in this era of time. With what power that they did hold and chose in force, were minor poisons such as, provisions, duties and the were the presence and face of their country. Although their power was little, in both cases the emperor and pope could choose to use their power and control the social class to be and do what they wanted. All the general and political power was passed down through social class. Despite both the Emperor and Pope were figure heads they both held different positions. …show more content…

As a leader the Pope in medieval Europe was a religious leader whom, was a ruler main governing body of the Catholic Church, and each Pope was the ruler of his country or estate. The Pope ensured all that the Catholic Church didn't descend down into chaos, and the Kings tried to maintain control over their subjects and lower class. The Pope was also feared has he was the head of the Catholic Church and was feared they would be implaced into hell, in which in this time was a highly feared place. The Emperor was a leader who was a feudal character of the Japanese society who created a situation in which control of the country, and the emperor remained in his place as a symbol of sovereignty behind the shogun. The in Shogunate Japan was known as royalty, to the people below him. Although there were minor similarities between the role of the Emperor and the Pope differences heavily outweighed

More about Emperor And Pope Similarities

Open Document