Effects of Illegal Insider Trading

756 Words2 Pages

"Insider trading" is a term that most investors have heard and usually associate with illegal conduct. But the term actually includes both legal and illegal conduct. The legal version is when corporate insiders—officers, directors, and employees—buy and sell stock in their own companies. When corporate insiders trade in their own securities, they must report their trades to the SEC.
Illegal insider trading refers generally to buying or selling a security, in breach of a fiduciary duty or other relationship of trust and confidence, while in possession of material, nonpublic information about the security. Insider trading violations may also include "tipping" such information, securities trading by the person "tipped," and securities trading by those who misappropriate such information. Because insider trading undermines investor confidence in the fairness and integrity of the securities markets, the SEC has treated the detection and prosecution of insider trading violations as one of its enforcement priorities. Insider trading is believed to raise the cost of capital for securities issuers, thus decreasing overall economic growth.
Laws making insider trading illegal should be revoked. Please do not get me wrong, I believe insiders with access to information should ethically respect the confidentiality of agreements in their workplace along with their fiduciary duties. I believe that insider trading, based on material nonpublic information, benefits investors by more quickly introducing new information into the market. Insider trading is supposed to even the playing field, but eliminating insider trading as a crime will benefit all the investors in the market.
Insider trading can actually be considered an active good. A market...

... middle of paper ...

... if sales are up or down for Panera.
People argue that insider information can cause an unfair disadvantage for the smaller investors, but I believe fair only exists in someone’s fairy tale land. The markets will always be unbalanced. Some market participants have faster computers, better algorithms, smarter staffs and work for businesses that transact with investment banks that will offer favorable allocations in Initial Public Offering’s because they are better clients. In life, someone will always have the upper hand somewhere. The large investors thrive on information asymmetry, so eliminating the insider trading laws will likely affect those major market players.
Insider trading is a victimless act. So how is it a crime when there is no victim? When investors trade in the market, they don’t know who is on the other side of the trade as a buyer or a seller.

Open Document