Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of the market revolution in usa society
Benefits and liabilities of the market revolution
Benefits and liabilities of the market revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of the market revolution in usa society
In the middle of the nineteenth century, an economic transformation occurred in the United States. Historians refer to this event as the market revolution. Americans integrated technologies of the Industrial Revolution into a new profitable market economy. Steam power moved steamboats and railroads, fueled the rise of American industry by powering mills and sparking new national transportation networks. Alexis de Tocqueville said on his first visit to America: ”No sooner do you set foot on American soil and you will see how everything is on the move around you.” This is considered a bold term that conjures up images of radical transformation within the American economy. However, not everybody enthusiastically participated in the new market …show more content…
The economic transformation produced an explosive growth in the nation’s output and trade and a rise in the general standard of living, but in the Northeast it just grew the inequality between citizens. Alarmed at the threat of being reduced to the status of dependent wage earners, skilled craftsmen in the late 1820s created the world’s first Workingmen’s Parties, short-lived political organizations that sought to mobilize lower-class support for candidates who would press for social issues in favor of the country. In 1833, journeymen carpenters struck for higher wages and warned of more protest to come. Such actions and language were not confined to male workers; the young mill women of Lowell also walked off their jobs in 1834 to protest a reduction in wages. The mill women were active through the protests even two years later. Orestes Brownson said that “Emerson’s self-trust, self-reliance, self-control, self-culture- offered an adequate response to social inequality”. (p …show more content…
The Democrats believed that the states should have as much power as possible and that the federal government should only have the powers absolutely necessary for the nation to function. They were against the Protective Tariff and the national bank. They overvalued the individual and believed that anyone can be important. This message was well received by small farmers and factory workers. Slave owners also favored this message, fearing that the federal government might try to end slavery. Andrew Jackson also believed that the states should finance turnpikes, canals, and eventually, railroads. When he didn't support many Ohioans who wanted federal government assistance for roads and other forms of transportation, they went against him. In 1834 political opponents of President Andrew Jackson structured a new party to contest Jacksonian Democrats nationally and in the states. Guided by their most prominent leader, Henry Clay, they called themselves Whigs. Whigs united behind the American System, believing that via a protective tariff, a national bank, and aid to internal improvements, the federal government could lead economic development. They were strong in the Northeast, one of the most rapidly modernizing region of the country. Historians have interpreted the Whigs in strikingly different ways. They have been seen as champions of banks, business, corporations, economic growth, the positive liberal state,
In the late nineteenth century, many European immigrants traveled to the United States in search of a better life and good fortune. The unskilled industries of the Eastern United States eagerly employed these men who were willing to work long hours for low wages just to earn their food and board. Among the most heavily recruiting industries were the railroads and the steel mills of Western Pennsylvania. Particularly in the steel mills, the working conditions for these immigrants were very dangerous. Many men lost their lives to these giant steel-making machines. The immigrants suffered the most and also worked the most hours for the least amount of money. Living conditions were also poor, and often these immigrants would barely have enough money and time to do anything but work, eat, and sleep. There was also a continuous struggle between the workers and the owners of the mills, the capitalists. The capitalists were a very small, elite group of rich men who held most of the wealth in their industries. Strikes broke out often, some ending in violence and death. Many workers had no political freedom or even a voice in the company that employed them. However, through all of these hardships, the immigrants continued their struggle for a better life.
Textile mills were established in New England’s countryside. Many women left farms in order to work in the mills. What were they offered? What were working conditions in the mills like? Why was the Lowell Female Labor Reform Association formed?
The Market Revolution was one of the most important changes of American society before 1850. It was the adoption of a nation wide commercial change that would later alter all the different societies within the country. Wilentz described this period as the development of a market based economy and the dramatic changes in America’s behavior during the first half of the nineteenth century. Collectively, Sean Wilentz wrote about how historians argued about the topic of the market revolution and how each part of the country was affected by this time period and the changes that resulted.
There were a lot of courses and effect that the Market Revolution left in the U.S. The Market Revolution was a series of innovations that led the creation of nb integrated national marketplace; it included the long distance coordination of the production, and distribution and consumption of goods. The Market Revolution in the United States was a drastic change in the manual-labor system originating in the South; and it was soon moving to the north. The Market Revolution was a change in the economic transformation that occurred in America during the first half of the nineteenth century. The market revolution changed more than just where people sold their goods, it also transformed how people lived and did. While the market revolution provided new opportunities and increased freedom, it also generated a great deal of concern.
Two political rivals at their time impacted the lives of Americans from the 1820s through 1840s. With the removal of property requirements for voting, Andrew Jackson leader of the democratic party was elected in 1828 as the seventh president of the U.S. Jackson saw himself as a loyal representative of the common man; an advocate of state rights and the slavery system expansion in the western territory of the U.S. Henry Clay was seen by Jackson as politically conniving, an astute, and overconfident man. He presumed that Clay would trade off the basics of American republican vote based system to propel his own self-serving objectives. Clay was a prominent senator, the leader of the Whig party, and known for his domestic policy. He opposed the
Throughout the period of 1820-1830, Jacksonian Democrats created a vastly popular political party. They were, of course, led by Andrew Jackson, a war hero and a man of the people. Jackson's followers who created the party were also "for the people." Such ideals were shown throughout various times within the period. The democrats were essentially guardians of the United States Constitution and, similarly, were protectors of individual liberties. In addition to this, the Jacksonian Democrats promoted political democracy, and also the equality of economic opportunity. Thus, the Jacksonian Democrats clearly served as protectors of the people, their individual liberties, their Constitution, their economic opportunities and their political democracy.
As the Industrial Revolution was spreading throughout the United States, the construction of a more efficient cotton mill began in 1821 began in Lowell, Massachusetts. The Lowell Mill was genius - water powered and sure to duplicate over the next decade or so. The only remaining factor to complete this process would be labor workers. Luckily, most jobs in cotton factories required neither great strength nor special skills, so for the first time, women were considered as equal as men in the field of labor (Bailyn 293). In addition, they were more compliant. Although there were many single young women in the New England area, farmers would refuse to allow their daughters to work due to the belief that the lowell mills would inevitably fail. On the other hand, the girls of which were allowed to work were forced to work harder and harder for less and less money - women typically worked 11-13 hours a day, six days a week at a wage of about $3.50 a week (Willis 64).
The United States in the 1870s was highly agrarian focused, centered on the local community with individuals taking pride in their work. This was a time where small businesses and farms were the center of the American economy. In a striking comparison, the early 20th century marked an era of heavy industrialization and a wider view of the nation as a whole. The decades in between were filled with violent and rapid change in all aspects of American life. By and large through the expansion of business across state lines, an explosion of growth in railroads, and huge leaps in the technologies responsible for efficient industry. These aspects were the driving force behind the new America that was born from the haze of industrialization.
Led by Clara Lemlich, 20,000 immigrants, mostly young women, demanded a twenty percent pay raise, a fifty-two hour workweek, and a closed shop (59). Their cause gained a significant amount of attention and caught the eye of wealthy progressive reformers, such as Alva Belmont and Anne Morgan, who perceived the strike as an opportunity to also advocate their own objective: women’s suffrage. Wealthy elites like Carnegie and Sumner may have believed that efforts to change the natural order are futile, but Morgan claimed that after learning about the details of the strike, she and other women wouldn’t be able to live their lives “without doing something to help them” (72). These affluent women demonstrated their support from both sides of the spectrum, from modestly distributing ribbons and buttons, to Alva Belmont’s contribution of her several cars to a parade for the striking workers (682) and the pledge of her mansion as surety for the bail of four strikers (76). Without the aid of these women, it was doubtful the strikers “could have lasted much longer without progressive money” (70). However, frustration arose amongst picketers as these progressive reformers turned a strike based on class struggle into a “broader feminist revolt” (68). Morgan blamed the strikers’ treatment on the inability for women to vote, not their inability to unionize (67). Striker’s retorted, asking
With ambitious social endeavors comes a flourish of advancement of technology and terminology that changes society, individuals, and the freedom that coexists between them, but change is never far off from where it roots from. The market revolution was a period of many innovations within America that had helped with westward expansion through innovations contributed to long distance communication, transportation, and manufacturing in which such advancements have never been seen before. These innovations have changed terms, freedoms, and fundamentally the economy at large.
The development of the Lowell Mills in the 1820s provided American women with their first opportunity to work outside the home with reasonable wages and relatively safe work. About ten years later however, working in the mills wasn’t the same. Working conditions became more vigorous, the mills were unsafe and the pay received didn’t match the amount of work done.
Women’s history in the United States has always been represented as a struggle for rights. Wealth and status were tied to either their fathers or husbands. In the early 1900s, women were afforded the traditional roles of society. The majority of women worked in the home. If they were of the 18% young or poor women, they also worked in factories as laborers, manufacturing items for the booming industrial revolution (U.S. Department of Labor, 1980). During this time period the workplace was not in compliance with current safety standards. There was no minimum wage yet, work conditions were horrible and they worked long hours, “In 1900, the average workweek in manufacturing was 53 hours,” (Fisk, 2003). Women took “pink collared jobs” or “woman’s work” that paid less than men’s wages. These jobs such as secretaries, waitresses, garment workers and housekeepers are still significantly underpaid today. Many widows and mothers were not able to make ends meet and often had to have their children work as well to support the family. Women had no rights to change these conditions or their circumstances. The inability to partake in the democratic process was something many women were angry with; Alice Paul was one of them.
Early industrialization relied heavily on the female labor workforce in rural New England. For example, jobs involving “commercial artisans appear always to have been male, and outwork weavers were overwhelmingly female (Dublin 38).” Men see the embodiment of women as uncontrollable, hysterical, irrational, and incapable of work. Even when Abigail Adams, a progressive advocate wrote to her husband, “If particular care and attention is not paid to the ladies, we are determined to foment a rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any laws in which we have no voice or representation (Katz 172).” John Adams, her husband responded, “As to your extraordinary code of laws, I cannot but laugh (Katz 172).” Her vision for expanding women inferior status ultimately questions women’s identity with
In the mid-nineteenth century, the United States heralded the coming of the “new industrial order.” With the advent of railroads, industrialization went into full swing. Factories and mills appeared and multiplied, and the push for economic progress became the grand narrative of the country. Still, there was a conscious effort to avoid the filth and poverty so prevalent in European factory towns. Specifically, the town of Lowell, Massachusetts, was held up as an exemplary model of industrial utopia. The mill town included beautiful landscaping and dormitories for the women workers. Indeed, it looked much like a university campus (Klein 231). Nevertheless, this idealized vision eventually gave way to the reality of human greed. The female factory workers worked long hours for little pay as their health deteriorated from the hazardous conditions (238). (Specifically, Carson’s Mill in Dalton, Massachusetts, served as the model for Melville’s short story [Melville 2437].) In this way, industrialization (and the subsequent desire for economic wealth) became incompatible with democratic principles. Originally, the prevailing consciousness was that industrialization would further democracy and the two would become a complimentary pair. However, the reality was that these societal changes brought economic divisions; the boundaries were drawn more clearly between the privileged class and the working class.
Goldfield, David. The Market Revolution and Social Reform. Vol. 1, chap. 12 in The American Journey, A History of the United States, by David R. Goldfield. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2014.