Ecclesiastes Utterly Meaningless

679 Words2 Pages

Many reviewers of Ecclesiastes assert that the general message is of despair and cynical wisdom. Others understand the book to be a more positive education tool that instructs the reader how to enjoy life in an obstreperous world by means of an attentive relationship with God. Well respected theologians settle firmly on either side of the debate. At the centre of the dispute is the interpretation of the most dominant motif, “‘Meaningless! Meaningless!” says the Teacher. ‘Utterly meaningless! Everything is meaningless.’”(Ecc 1:2, NIV) Much of the challenge regarding this phrase is due to the translation of the word hebel, which the NIV renders as meaningless, while others render it alternatively. Inasmuch as hebel occurs many times in each chapter of the book it is vital that readers apprehend its denotation and significance to accurately establish the …show more content…

Some translators recognized the various uses of hebel throughout the Old Testament and attempted to apply these diverse renderings within the book of Ecclesiastes itself. Consequently, the NASB uses various translations of hebel; vanity (1:2, 14; 2:11, 17; 4:4; 6:9), fleeting (6:12; 7:15; 9:9), and futility (2:1, 6:4, 9; 7:6). Additionally, “Other scholars suggest several nuances: temporal ephemerality and existential futility or absurdity (Crenshaw), mainly futility but sometimes brevity (Whybray), senseless or absurd (Fox), and the notion that life is enigmatic, and mysterious; that there are many unanswered and unanswerable questions (Ogden).” However, Bartholomew challenges scholars’ dependency upon the Old Testament variant renderings to support the necessity of such an approach within Ecclesiastes. He asserts that, “in the majority of places in the OT where hebel is used—and in Ecclesiastes in particular—it is used metaphorically, and the challenge is to work out in this context the connotations of

Open Document