The article that I found on Google about privacy and security on the internet had an author and so did the article about privacy and security that I found on EBSCOHost. Neither of the articles were signed, but the article from EBSCOHost looked like a more resourceful one. The author from the Google article is David Gorodyansky. He seemed to be pretty credible, but not as credible or knowledgable as Scott Peppet, the author of the EBSCOHost article. The article from Google had no sources, but the one that I found on EBSCOHost provided a source where you can find the exact location of the article. This goes to show that anyone can put anything on the internet and that you have to be careful believing and/or using the information online and check it and make sure it’s accurate. …show more content…
The EBSCOHost article looked very accurate it provided the source, author, the document type, subject terms, summary, author affiliations, and etc. The Google article didn’t provide any of that. The EBSCOHost article was error free and it also, stated that none of the information from the University of Texas at Austin School of Law Publications content cannot be copied or used on multiple websites because it’s content is copyrighted. That shows that the content from EBSCOHost is authentic and directly from the source. Where as, the Google article looked error free didn’t provide me with anything that said it was copyrighted. Which means the article can be one’s opinion or some made up nonsense. Therefore, the Google is not as credible or accurate as the EBSCOHost article. Both articles doesn’t have an editor or someone who verifies the information. The only difference is that EBSCOHost owns all rights to it’s content and all of content is copyrighted. Where as, the article from Google more so resembles a
Both articles give true factual information and unique perspectives on the study of bed bugs. However, the primary source expands lot more into in-depth detail and elaborates more on the nature of bed bugs and mentions a specific study and data. Moreover, it was also written by collaborated researchers, whereas the secondary source was written by only one author. The secondary source does have a clear, understandable vocabulary, and its relative brevity allows a much easier read. However, like all secondary sources, it lacks the formality, credibility and validity of the primary source.
The Iowa model is the research translation model that was developed by Marita G. Titler, PhD, RN. The Iowa model depicts the importance of a holistic approach to the entire health care system spanning from the provider to the patient, and the supporting infrastructure; all of which utilize the latest research to guide and shape what is known as “best practice.” The Iowa model is designed in such a way that it aids the NP through engagement in problem identification and solution development as it relates to incorporating evidence findings into practice.
3. Herman T. Tavani, "Privacy Online," Computers and Society, Vol. 29, No. 4, 1999, pp. 11-19.
Price and Sorrells shows that companies are taking too much advantage from the customer, the government, even though their trying, needs to start helping the people protect their privacy, and a balance between the amount of trust people should have giving out their sensitive records to which information is protected. A concern that is happening that the government and corporations is that personal information is not secured well enough. Price states how over 100 million sensitive records were hacked or lost in a year and the percent of increase in data breaches is 650 more than last year. Her description of how unreliable the government is with personal information by using logical and well researched information to put no faith and fear in the reader.
The paper will deal with two aspects of the privacy-vs-security issue. The first one is concerned with general civil liberties, where privacy is understood to mean freedom to make personal (private) choices in our own homes, control our daily lives and decide with whom we share information that is of our concern – information about our emotions, attitudes, behavior and future decisions and events. The second aspect deals with the privacy vs. security on the internet. Since we live in a technological era, internet has become an inseparable part of our l...
Solove, Daniel J. “5 Myths about Privacy” Washington Post: B3. Jun 16 2013. SIRS. Web. 10
...as not only been reliable when it arises to offering a product of the highest and excellence, nonetheless is also continually developing, adjusting, but more meaningfully revolutionizing the industry. Also, what creates Google’s invention so matchless in assessment to its challengers is the attention that it offers to consumer requirements in order to offer a consistent and difficultly substituted the product rather than concentrating on exploiting its profit with each given chance which may cooperation the quality of its search consequence its product. Having examined the company’s internal and external environment it is obvious that Google earnings care and attentions even to the smallest detail to guarantee that it will be the leading company between many other online search engines and has been able to create loyal customers that are continually growing.
Comparing Two Sources There are disagreements and agreements between source A and source B. Source A was from a report written by a journalist Humphrey Tyler, who worked for a South African magazine. The report was written later on the same day that the shooting occurred. Source B was from an English newspaper, published the day after the shooting. Source A and source B both agree and disagree with each other over different things.
You may have heard of the website Wikileaks. Wikileaks is/was an online organization, dedicated to exposing corrupt governments and large corporations. Since its upbringing in October of 2006 by Julian Assange, it has published over one million articles and is credited as one of the largest ‘leak’ sources in modern society. These articles, mainly published by anonymous civilians, vary in degree from patent battles to millions of confidential government documents (Wikileaks & Wikileaks Wikipedia).
LeRoux, Yves. "Privacy concerns in the digital world." 03 Oct 2013. Computer Weekly. 24 April 2014 .
The public’s perception of these two products is very different. Most people see Google as ‘the’ search engine; people have grown up with it and its most people’s first stop when searching for something on the internet, in fact when people are unsure of something they’ll often use the expression “I’ll Google it”, this sums up how important Google is in everyday life. There is however a small problem that accompanies brands that get as big as Google and that is a fear of a monopoly and how much power a company has over the economy/ the entire world.
The article that I find really details and contain two sides of my argument, either of the side, he has found more than one source that supports his argument, this is why I think, his source is really
Gonchar, Michael. “What Is More Important: Our Privacy or National Security?” New York Times. New York Times, 17 Sept. 2013. Web. 22 Feb. 2014.
Levy, Steven, Brad Stone, and Peter Suciu. "All Eyes On Google. (Cover Story)." Newsweek 143.13 (2004):
Is Google Making Us Stupid? - Magazine - The Atlantic. (n.d.). The Atlantic — News and analysis on politics, business, culture, technology, national, international, and life – TheAtlantic.com. Retrieved April 21, 2012, from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/6868/