ESEA Argumentative Essay

453 Words1 Page

In 1965, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was signed by President Lyndon Baines Johnson. This law served as an opportunity to students of low-income by providing them with grants for textbooks and library books, special education centers, scholarships for university students, and grants to improve the quality of elementary and secondary education. However, in 2002, the ESEA law was reauthorized and was signed into law by President George W. Bush and renamed it: No Child Left Behind Act (“Elementary & Secondary Education Act”). The purpose of the No Child Left behind Act is to provide all students with an equal opportunity to obtain a high-quality education so that achievement gaps will no longer exist. This law requires that students of grades 3-8 be tested in subjects, reading and math. By 2014, it is expected that students meet or exceed state standards in these subjects. Results from these state examinations will be seen in …show more content…

It has brought upon many arguments because people believe it does not benefit all the adolescent students. To begin with, a major problem for this act is not having enough resources for all children. Only low-income students are being targeted, what about other elementary and secondary school students? Also, teachers are teaching students to the test. But subjects that students are being taught may not even be on the test so that’s a problem. The No Child Left Behind Act encourages poor-performing students to be absent on test days. Although, a student may be performing poorly, they should still be able to take the test to see where they can improve in. When it comes to scores, school-wide average scores are being reported without revealing the gaps between low and high performing students. Finally, those who do poorly on the tests, are being pushed out of school. The title of the act is “No child left behind”, its purpose should own up to its

Open Document