E. Fuller Torrey

1191 Words3 Pages

Having a foundation for treatment for those who suffer from schizophrenia is very important to recovery. Depending on what type of treatment and how it is used will determine an individual's progress. E. Fuller Torrey makes the argument that antipsychotic drugs are the most useful and effective way for recovery. Against this belief is Robert Whitaker who believes that society reacts too quickly by just giving medication. Alternative solutions, such as moral therapy, should be used in order to fully recover. So, are antipsychotic medications the treatment of choice for people with psychosis?

E. Fuller Torrey, author of "The Treatment of Schizophrenia: Medications", believes that even though antipsychotic drugs cannot cure psychosis they do control it. Antipsychotic drugs were introduced in 1952 by a French psychiatrist by the name of Pierre Deniker. These drugs were split into two classes, first generation and second generation. First generations were considered "typical" because of their ability to block dopamine receptors while second generations were referred to as "atypical" for their action on other neurotransmitters. In the beginning, antipsychotics had some serious side effects, which included acute dystonia reactions, EPS, Akathisia and Parkinsonian - like symptoms. New and improved antipsychotic drugs have been created to have the same effectiveness but with fewer side effects. Overall "70 percent improved, 25 percent improved minimally or not at all and 5 percent got worse." The main purpose of these drugs are to "reduce symptoms, shorten hospitalization, and reduce re-hospitalization." Another advantage of these types of drugs is that 80 to 90 percent give relief to positive symptoms, which would include hallucinatio...

... middle of paper ...

...en his statement of “Over the past twenty-five years, outcomes for people in the United States with schizophrenia have worsened” comes with no evidence that his assumption has any truth or validity to it. He does make a list of people who authored various studies, Bockoven, Rappaport, Mosher, Van Putten, Harding and WHO and then makes general conclusions of what these studies had found. But he provides no details, statistics or even support that backs up with evidence what he is trying to point out to as fact.

In conclusion, both authors had very strong points; however, Torrey had the better foundation to his argument by backing it up with evidences along with having more scientific data and studies. Whitaker had a good opinion, but his evidence was not as strong. He did not have a valid plan on how we can change policies; because of this his argument was weak.

Open Document