Dr. Ware's Argument Against Baptism

668 Words2 Pages

There are so many questions surrounding the meaning of baptism in the church. From personal experience it almost seems as if every church has their own view of baptism and steps that need to be taken in order to be baptized. One major question, is when is it the proper time or age to get baptized? I personally don’t have a strong opinion on this question. I don’t believe it’s a right or wrong question to be baptized as an infant. By definition Baptism is an outward act that symbolizes the inward phenomenon of coming to and accepting Jesus Christ as real, as God incarnate, as the sacrificial means by which those who believe in him can be forever reconciled to God. The purpose of baptism is to give visual testimony of our commitment to Christ. …show more content…

Professor Bruce Ware believes paedobaptist (the practice of baptizing infants or young children) are “living in disobedience to Christ.” Paedobaptist see practival value in both the baptism of new converts and the baptism of their children. Dr. Ware believes the argument for Immersion is simultaneously an argument against the baptism of infants. Dr. Wares doctrine allows neither the baptism of infants nor, presumably, their belongings to the church as the family of God. For the credobaptism, typically, baptisms is a sign of what the believer has done in response to Christ; for the paedobaptist, baptism is first a sign of what Christ has done and of all that is in him to be received in faith. Dr. Ware citation (from Thomas R. Schreiner) that “it is difficult to see how the reception of the Spirit could be predicted of infants since the Spirit is received by faith” (pg. 28) If so infant salvation surely is impossible, and it is difficult to know what to make of the spirits work on the humanity of our Lord. The bible also talks about household baptism which may have included infants. Acts 31-34 states “31They replied, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved—you and your household.” 32 Then they spoke the word of the Lord to him and to all the others in his house. 33 At that hour of the night the jailer took them and washed their wounds; then immediately he and all his household were baptized. 34 The jailer brought them into his house and set a meal before them; he was filled with joy because he had come to believe in God—he and his whole household.” These verses never directly say if children were included in the household baptism but Dr. Ware seeks to close these textual “gaps” to insist that only those converted were

More about Dr. Ware's Argument Against Baptism

Open Document