Dr Money And The Boy With No Penis Moral Analysis

1065 Words3 Pages

Marisa Trolio 1000457640 Wednesday, October29th, 2014 SOC200H1F – L0201 Ethical Concerns of “Dr. Money and the Boy With No Penis” To understand the ways in human beings act is ultimately what all sociologist try to explain. However, the extent that scientists can go to acquire that knowledge can be extreme. There’s a line between having to acquire the knowledge for society and protecting the subject of study. Scientist encounters this line whenever they are about to embark on an experiment. “Dr. Money and the Boy With No Penis” shows the unethical ways in which a subject right as a human being is diminished in order for the experiment to be a success. The experiment displays various events in which the ethical agreements were not acknowledged …show more content…

Dr. Money’s fixation on the success of his theory deteriorated the life of both Brenda through the oppression of Brenda’s true gender. In the documentary, Dr. Money stated it was essential for Brenda not to know her true gender and to make a point for her to behave like a female. Brenda’s mother stated, “Girls didn’t want to play with her because she wanted to play boy games and boys didn’t want to play with girls” Since Brenda was forced to act differently than her true nature, Brenda was aliened from social groups in school which, subjected her to bullying leading a troubled and lonely life. The repercussions of Dr. Money’s experiment lead Brenda to lead a life of loneness. Her well being was compromised in order for Dr. Money’s experiment to prevail. Therefore, Dr. Money’s experiment ignored the welfare of Brenda in order for the experiment to continue which lead to a lesser quality of …show more content…

Dr. Money falsely reported conclusions from his therapy sessions with Brenda in order for his theory to be presented correctly. In the documentary, it states, “that before he published Brenda’s case as a success, he was aware that there could be some problems ‘there is not much chance in a change of mind. She was maniacal in the way she interacted with others.’” This confirms that Dr. Money had his doubts in Brenda’s case and intentionally withheld that information from the public and told the experiment as success. His deliberate denial of information to the public shows his unethical methods and complete ignorance of the potential

More about Dr Money And The Boy With No Penis Moral Analysis

Open Document