Dr Jekyll And Mr Hyde Psychological Analysis

1498 Words3 Pages

“Man is not truly one, but truly two”. Stevenson’s novella, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, addresses late Victorian anxieties and theories regarding psychology. Gall’s theories of lateralization, as well as the inklings of psychoanalysis, were beginning to emerge, bringing their influence into literature. The intrapsychic processes of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde illustrate an evident duality of persona throughout the novella, which was an evolving thought in the study of psychology at the time. The binate facets of the self are portrayed through recount of action and character description, and exist in the novella to exemplify the marred and non-equipotent nature of humanity as a whole. Dr. Jekyll embodies a caricature of a well respected
The localizationist theory, a forerunner of psychological theories at the time, focused on “how mental activities (or cognitive processes) are organized in the brain” (Zola-Morgan 360). It was suggested that “each brain hemisphere might house a separate personality, … a separate soul” (Stiles 882). From the standpoint of late Victorian psychology, it was frequently proposed that the two brain hemispheres presented “contrasting desires and moral inclinations” (Stiles 882) in addition to contrasting abilities. Henry Jekyll is a well respected doctor with a “large handsome face” with “every mark of capacity and kindness” (Stevenson 46, 45). On the other hand, Edward Hyde is described by multiple characters as “displeasing, something downright detestable, . . . [giving] a strong feeling of deformity” (Stevenson 37). Following trends in Victorian psychology at the time, such as the emergence of evolutionary psychology, Hyde can be interpreted as a less developed, premature, and primitive form of Jekyll. His “dusky pallor and … swart growth of hair” (Stevenson 82) are reminiscent of cliché Neanderthal figure. As Stiles proposes, Jekyll embodies the “pinnacle of evolution, … [but] Hyde approaches its nadir” (884). Hyde’s appearance, as well as his actions, are nowhere near as refined or learned as those of Jekyll’s, representing an immature version of the altruistic
Stevenson suggests Hyde’s left-handedness in the “odd, upright hand” of his letter, only differing from Jekyll’s handwriting in its “differently sloped” style (52, 54). Their writing is regarded as remarkably similar despite the difference in slope and angles. It is here that Stevenson is depicting the “singular resemblance” (54) between Jekyll and Hyde, suggesting that they may not be as separate as may seem. The two facets of Jekyll ultimately have their differences in appearance and impulsivities, but they are much more tied together at their core than one might think. Both figures are aware of each other when in their respective states. When in his final moments, although he is essentially Hyde at the time, Jekyll can still realize that these are the final moments when he can “think his own thoughts or see his own face” (Stevenson 89). This awareness of the other character within himself emphasizes that the two are indeed merely divergent facets of one entity. Stevenson has constructed each persona in such a polarized manner that it is difficult to view them as stemming from the same seed. Stevenson addresses the internal struggle that humankind faces in respect to their desires and gratification of said desires: “All human beings are commingled out of good and evil, and Edward Hyde alone in the ranks of mankind, was pure

Open Document