Dr Jekyll And Mr Hyde Analysis

675 Words2 Pages

Good and evil have the same face; however, the difference in degree greatly depends on when these two abstracts cross the path of each individual human being. In a book highlighting highly acclaimed author Robert Louis Stevenson’s ability to relate this to literature, the writer states that Stevenson successfully developed a mystifying plot in which introduced the phenomenon of a single human entity occupying two distinct identities (Lazar, Karlan, and Salter 160-161). Ultimately, by painting an image of the malevolent and amoral Mr Hyde, Scottish author Robert Louis Stevenson’s novella The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde not only provided scientists with a backbone for which to base significant advancements in the scientific sectors …show more content…

For instance, Dr. Jekyll, the London physician plagued with the task of suppressing his dual personality, lived in a time during which evil was considered to be intertwined with religion. In an article reviewing the history and importance of religion in Europe, for example, the author states, “The United Kingdom was largely Christian; however, despite the large Christian following, the Church of England was only one part of the vibrant and often competitive religious culture in which non-Anglican Protestant denominations were enjoying a new prominence” (Buchanan 14). Ultimately, the small-scale emergence of religious diversity and opposition to the European monarch provided Stevenson with both a platform and an audience for which to voice his abiding interest in the nature of evil (a curiosity which most notably arose from his Calvinist upbringing). In addition to the cultural aspects of the late-nineteenth century in which led to the creation of the distinguished literary figure who capitalizes on the dualities of good and evil, a societal factor responsible for the creation of the figure is mentioned in a dissertation analyzing the concept of evil in relation to the Christian religion. In the dissertation, the writer states, “Evil in the broad sense, which includes all natural and moral evils, tends to be the sort of evil referenced in theological contexts, such as in discussions of the problem of evil. The problem of evil is the problem of accounting for evil in a world created by an all-powerful, all-knowing, all-good God” (Orel 45). This defining of moral evil not only led to the further study of scriptures as historical texts, but also served as a catalyst for influential scientific advances such as Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (a theory that made it difficult for

Open Document