Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflective essay on the bet by anton chekhov
Reflective essay on the bet by anton chekhov
Reflective essay on the bet by anton chekhov
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflective essay on the bet by anton chekhov
Life is built differently every day according to the choices we make. Every decision we make will have a result, some results might be good, other results might be bad, and even a single choice can result in death as the maximum prize. The objective of this essay is to compare two characters from different stories that learned something through a specific event or experience. This essay will analyze the histories “The Bet” by Anton Chekhov and “The Interlopers” by Saki. These two stories will mostly be compared on the choices that the character made, how they were affected by it, and a conclusion based on their past events.
“The Bet” by Anton Chekhov, is a story about two young men that were discussing about how capital punishment had to be replaced by imprisonment for life. For one of the young men, the banker, capital punishment was more moral than imprisonment for life because it killed the prisoner slowly, rather than the capital penalty killed him in minutes. On the other hand, the other man opposed to this thought. He said, “The death sentence and the life sentence are equally immoral, but if I had to choose between the death penalty and imprisonment for life, I would certainly choose the second. To live anyhow is better than not at all.”(Chekhov 1) The result of this event was a bet in which one of the young men had to proof that he could be imprisoned for fifteen years; In return, the banker had to pay him two million dollars. Even though that the banker gave the other men a chance to regret his decision, he did not. At first we can see that banker was completely sure that the other man could not stay longer than three or four years as he said “To me two millions is a trifle, but you are losing three or four years of the...
... middle of paper ...
...ngs in life than getting the better of a boundary dispute.”(Saki 1) This makes the reader understand that he regretted all of those wasted years of fighting.
In contrast of the two stories, in “The Bet” the banker did regret betting the two million dollars, but in the end he only tries to do something about it for his own benefit. He was going to commit murder just to avoid paying the money, while in “The Interlopers”, both of the characters regretted the fighting between families, they did talk about forget about the problem, and start being friends.
Eventually, both stories have similar endings where most of the characters regret an action that changed their life. As a result of bad choices, they end up in the wrong paths. We are building our future every day by the choices we make, but some of them might lead us to events that can change us in a good or bad way.
Both stories displayed the same similarity, and that was the shocking reality that happened at the end of both stories. The idealistic moments that happened in both stories is the reason behind both protagonist shocked and crushed in the end.
The similarities are prolific in their presence in certain parts of the novel, the very context of both stories shows similarities, both are dealing with an oppressed factor that is set free by an outsider who teaches and challenges the system in which the oppressed are caught.
To begin with, I will begin with a brief summary of both stories in order to better
The Interlopers is about the two rival families and their hunting feud. The Dangerous game also has a rivalry between Rainsford and a German huntsman. The two stories also both had groups of people with a plan filled with violence and murder. The one family in the Interlopers, were hunting on their own land, as was the German man in the Dangerous game. Both of these struggles take place in a natural environment as both enemies seek to kill their opponent, and thus both stories represent a desperate struggle to survive and to outlive the other.
Thus, both novels, full of tragedy and sorrow, began with the promise of new land, new beginnings and a better life, but all three were impossible to find within the pages of these novels. In the end, it was broken relationships, broken families, broken communities, but most importantly, broken dreams and broken hopes that were left on the final pages of both woeful, yet celebrated, stories.
“A Secret Lost in the Water” by Roch Carrier and “The Maiden Wiser Than the Tsar” retold by Idris Shah are both short stories rich in their plot and conflicts. The narrator and the Maiden both faced different conflicts, each associated with its own life lesson. While the differences between the internal conflicts of the narrator and the Maiden are striking, there is an important similarity.
Have you ever been lead to expect one outcome, but then had the situation turn out in a completely different way? The Interlopers ending is ironic and surprising since the author, Saki, leads the reader to believe the story will end opposite of how it actually ends. In the short story, Ulrich’s and Georg’s families previous feud over hunting land causes tension and suspense. Their feud builds the story and specific details based on the action guides the audience to the unexpected resolution. Irony also helps to develop an unpredictable, surprising conclusion in The Interlopers.
both stories shared similar ending and moral which is receiving enlightenment in first hand. "The
The themes of “The Lottery and “The Tell-Tale Heart” have its similarities but minor differences. The stylistic techniques the authors use in each story contribute to their themes. Irony and symbolism help support the 2 different themes of each story. Both stories involve death but are looked at in different ways.
In the beginning of both of the pieces of literature, the main character(s) have not had the experience that will shape their values yet. Rather, as time moves forward in the stories, the
“The expected is just the beginning. The unexpected is what changes our lives.” said by Grey’s anatomy actress Meredith Grey. The stories that are being compared are from two well known authors, H.H. Munro (Saki) and Shirley Jackson. Saki wrote a story about two enemies who have a generational family feud over a piece of land called “The Interlopers” and things take an unexpected turn for the worse in the end and Jackson’s story was about a village acting out their annual activity, “The Lottery”, which also takes an unexpected turn like “The Interlopers”. The authors of “The Interlopers” and “The Lottery”, by Saki and Shirley Jackson, use the literary elements of pacing, foreshadowing, and structure of text to build suspense and tension and
... almost nothing alike from a superficial aspect. The stories have different historical contexts and they simply don’t have much in common to the average audience. It is easy to contrast the stories, but deep within certain elements, the stories can be linked in several ways.
works of literature have tremendous amounts of similarity especially in the characters. Each character is usually unique and symbolizes the quality of a person in the real world. But in both stories, each character was alike, they represented honor, loyalty, chivalry, strength and wisdom. Each character is faced with a difficult decision as well as a journey in which they have to determine how to save their own lives. Both these pieces of literatures are exquisite and extremely interesting in their own ways.
In the short stories, Marigolds by Eugenia Collier, and The Bet by Anton Chekhov, both Lizabeth and the Lawyer, along with their understanding of life, are similar, as well as very different. While both Lizabeth and the Lawyer develop a deeper understanding and knowledge of their situations by the end of each story, the processes that lead them to these realizations are very different, as race, gender, and social class all play a role in how the two characters develop.
Both narratives compare as timeless tales of reputable heroes. They both include similar plots of long journeys back home. The main characters’ flaws are arrogance which is the source of many of their troubles.