Doll's House Criticism

798 Words2 Pages

According to Henrik Ibsen, the institution of marriage was secure. Women did not even have the thought of leaving their husbands and the roles within the marriage were clearly defined. In the play, A Doll’s House, it questions certain perspectives as it relates to traditional attitudes, which is highly debatable and provokes intense criticism. Furthermore, in order to fully explain, one must understand characterization, theme, and the use of symbols throughout the play. First, there is characterization which is the act of creating or describing characters or people. Nora Helmer is a very interesting character to say the least. Based on the article, “Infection: The Motivating Factor Behind Nora’s Flight in A Doll House” speaks about Nora’s characterization of range from a childish neurotic to a “romantic standard bearer of the feminist cause” (Brooks 14). Based on certain information she is a person of complexity and strength. From the beginning, Nora’s character is known to be the major influence throughout the entire play. She is the character that can or has obtained empathy solely based on the fact that she desires to be recognized as an intelligent woman and not just a “silly girl,” as Torvald refers to her as. On …show more content…

In the play A Doll’s House, the author provides an unfavorable image that describes how women of all economic class in his society were able to maintain. Basically, the female characters described throughout the play demonstrate Nora’s claim that even though men refuse to surrender their integrity, “hundreds of thousands of women have.” For example, in order for Mrs. Linde to provide for her mother and two brothers, she found it necessary to abandon the love her life in order to marry someone who had more money. Another example would be the nanny who had to relinquish her rights as a parent in order to take care of herself by working as Nora’s

Open Document