Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The "Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protect Act, is a piece of financial reform legislation passed in 2010, shortly after the housing crisis, by the Obama administration. It is named after key sponsors Senator Christopher Dodd and Representative Barney Frank. This act served as a response to the financial crisis of 2008. Its intention was to decrease the risks in the U.S. financial system. This act helped establish numerous government agencies, who are given the task of overseeing and regulating different aspects of the banking system. It is important to note, the Trump administration is working to repeal the act, as of June 8th. Recently, the Republican controlled U.S. House of representatives have voted to repeal and replace it with the Financial CHOICE act, which plans on …show more content…
It is also tasked with providing restricting or possibly liquidations, delivered by the Orderly Liquidation Fund, which provides capital to aid in the closing of financial intuitions that have either been placed in receivership, in addition to preventing another government bailout via tax dollars. Banks that are considered “Too big to fail”, can be broken up under the authority of the council. These are banks who may pose incredible systematic risk (risk in the economy). In addition, the council may require banks to increase their reserve requirements. In addition, we have the CFPB, which is tasked with preventing predatory mortgage lending, this is believed to reflect that belief that the subprime mortgage lending was the key cause in the 2008 crisis. Furthermore, it no longer allows for mortgage brokers to earn increased commissions for closing loans with higher interest rates or fees. Eliminating the incentive of predatory mortgage
This bank held government money and controlled the economy by making it easier for local banks to borrow money from it to loan it to manufacturers and factories. As the idea arose the cabinet, Jefferson protested that such a bank was unconstitutional because it favored the north over the south since the bank did not loan money to farmers for land expansions. Being true as it is, the bank drastically boosted our economy and had a great future for our nation. Since it was unconstitutional, a compromise said that the bank would only be funded for 20 years. So as soon as Andrew Jackson was elected, he destroyed the bank. In response to this, our nation suddenly falls into a major depression. No one had jobs and the economy was dying. This showed the brilliance of the national bank and how much it helped our economy. Adding onto this, the bank began the formation of the Federalist and Democratic
First, Andrew Jackson, aimed towards all of the strict constructionists, brought up the point that the formation of a national bank is not in the Constitution, and therefore there is no reason why we should be able to use it. President Jackson also said how the national bank is “rebellious of the rights of the states, and dangerous to the liberties of the people”. Jackson could see that the bank was a monopoly, and the danger that this could bring. He said how the bank is run primarily by 25 people, 20 of which are elected by the bank stock holders, the other five are elected by the bank officials themselves, who in the long run can keep reelecting themselves, and corruption is bound to follow.
...direct control over the agents who deal directly with the consumer. The practices of these independent agents cannot be easily controlled. As a result, corporations should require mortgage brokers to screen all of their loan applications to avoid any allegations of predatory lending.
Leading up to the crisis of the housing market, borrowers got mortgages without understanding the terms. Banks were giving out loans to people the banks weren't sure could pay the money back. The closer to the crisis, the higher the frequency of illegitimate loans and mortgages. Because there were so many mortgages on houses that could not be paid back, millions of mortgages were foreclosed on, and the houses we...
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act brought the most significant changes to financial regulation in the United States since the reform that followed the Great Depression. It made changes in the American financial regulatory environment that affect all federal financial regulatory agencies and almost every part of the nation’s financial services industry. Like Glass-Steagall, the legislation passed after the Great Depression, it sought to regulate the financial markets and make another economic crisis less likely. Banks were deregulated in 1999 by the Gramm-Leach-Biley Act, which repealed the Glass-Steagall Act and essentially allowed for the excessive risk taken on by banks that caused the most recent financial crisis. The Financial Stability Oversight Council was established through the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and was created to address the systemic risks in the United States financial system and to improve coordination among financial regulators.
Globally, banks have been facing big challenges in the last few years and continue to do so. As a result of the financial crisis, the regulators have tightened the minimum capital requirements with the aims to create a more solid and shock-resistant banking system especially for the so called Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs). The Financial Stability Board is expecting to raise the total loss-absorbing capacity
...o stabilize the volatile banking system by providing an elastic currency, affording means to distribute the currency, and allowing for government supervision of banking operations. No longer were banks independent organizations working against each other. Now they were secure, interrelated operations. The Federal Reserve Act worked because it eliminated the competition to hoard money between the banks and put the power into the hands of the government. Now, credit could be made available to expanding businesses, jobs could be created, and the banks would no longer have to worry about bank runs "running" them out of business. Because of the Federal Reserve Act, the economy could once again become expansionary with confidence.
To understand the purpose and role of the Federal Reserve System, we must first know the origin of the central bank of the United States. On December 23, 1913 President Woodrow Wilson signed The Federal Reserve Act. The primary purpose of the act was to make sure that a supply of money and credit would be available in the United States to meet banking demands by establishing Federal Reserve Banks which would hold the responsibility of supporting the credit structure during periods of financial strain. Other banks were expected to rely on the Federal Reserve for emergency cash and credit. Government and banking influence would select the management, primarily a board of directors chosen by banks. Supervision would be by the Federal Reserve Board. The intent in 1913 was to create eight to twelve centrally located district Federal Reserve Banks and national banks would be required to keep a part of their reserve with the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve would receive deposits from the government and receive deposits and lend to member banks only. It took almost a year to determine the boundaries of the decided twelve districts and establish the twelve Reserve Banks (one of the four components of the Federal Reserve). Named after the city in which they are located, the twelve Banks are Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Kansas City, Dallas, and San Francisco.
In 1913, Wilson and Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act to make a decentralized national bank containing twelve local offices. By and large, all the private banks in every district possessed and worked that separate area's branch. In any case, the new Federal Reserve Board had the last say in choices influencing all branches, including setting financing costs and issuing money. This new managing an account framework settled national funds and credit and helped the monetary framework survive two world wars and the Great
The act allowed Bush to bypass certain laws and spy directly on Al-Qaeda by creating the NSA electronic surveillance program. As soon as the NSA electronic surveillance program was created, as far as
" The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, commonly known as the CFPB, has led the charge
" The Government-federal, state, and local-have the duty to monitor internet to a moderate extent in the U.S. because there is no law regulating to visualize other people's personal content or data. There are even protection laws that citizens use to advertise certain contents on the internet including other people's private email accounts.
The term “too big to fail” became popular when a U.S. Congressman used it in a 1984 Congressional hearing. The theory behind “too big to fail” is that some financial institutions are vital to the economy because they are so big that if they were to fail that the economy would be in a disastrous state and therefore people believe that the government should step in and help support and save these financial institutions when they face problems. (Investopedia) I believe that this is right in assuming that the financial institutions are vital to the economy but I also believe that it is a waste of government and tax payers money to keep bailing out the big financial institutions every time they need to be bailed out. The solution that I and many other people believe to help this be less of a problem is to break up the bigger financial institutions into smaller ones.
Mortgage loans are a substantial form of revenue for the financial industry. Mortgage loans generate billions of dollars in the financial industry. It is no secret that companies have the ability to make a lot of money by offering a variety of mortgage loan products. The problem was not mortgage loans but that mortgage companies were using unethical behavior to get consumer mortgage loans approved. Unfortunately, the Countrywide Financial case was not an isolated case. Many top name mortgage companies have been guilty of unethical behavior. Just as the American housing market was starting to recover from its worst battering since the Great Depression, a new scandal, an epidemic of flawed or fraudulent mortgage documents, threatens to send not just the housing market but the entire economy back into a tailspin (Nation, 2010).
The failure of adequate board accountability has indicated strong adverse effects on corporate performance including, the bankruptcy of various public companies, thereby casting serious doubt on the credibility and efficacy of board accountability. For example, Lehman Brothers scandal, the largest bankruptcy in U.S history, Northern Rock was a large failure of a financial institution in the United Kingdom (Hull 2015:16). In Ireland, the Anglo-Irish Bank created a huge bubble that plunged the state into economic recession. In September 28, 2008, the Irish Government signed into law, the “bank guarantee” which provided with immediate effect a guarantee arrangement to safeguard all deposits in retail, commercial, institutional and interbank transactions, covered bonds, senior debt and dated subordinated debt (Lenihan 2008). Banks in Ireland clearly needed yet more capital from the State (Irish Times 19 November 2011) and this underscores the need for the government’s bailout