Documentary on Suffrage, Not for Ourselves Alone by Geoffrey C. Ward

562 Words2 Pages

Not for Ourselves Alone The movie I watched this week was the Not for Ourselves Alone, produced by Ben Burns, Paul Barnes, and written by Geoffrey C. Ward in 1999. The documentary articulates the suffrage movement in the United States, along with Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s biography. In review, the movie dedicates a significant amount of time to the time after their deaths. Thus, the movie provided an overview of strategic moments in the woman’s suffrage history and the insights of two women’s lives. Not for Ourselves Alone delved into Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Station’s relationship with their parents, however, primary focus directly integrated on their strong willed fathers. Susan B. Anthony did not marry; however, Elizabeth Cody Stanton did and found herself surrounded by family and often times tied down. Nonetheless, there were brief clips of the economical tough times and their religious partialities. The movie focused on Anthony and Stanton's determination to the movement of women's rights, and covering the first women's rights convention at Seneca Falls, New York in 1848. The women’s rights convention in Seneca Falls is where the battle started, the battle for legislation and protection of a married woman’s property rights. However, the filmmakers did not make mention of further accomplishments during 1848 like “slavery being abolished in the West Indies, the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the Mexican-American war, the Communist Manifesto was published, and revolutions occurred in France and Germany” (McCann & Kim, 2013, p. 12). Thus, the 1848, the women’s rights convention at Seneca Falls can be claimed has the foremother of women’s liberation, however, limiting itself t... ... middle of paper ... ...archy is a set of social relations between men, which have a material base, and which, though hierarchical, establish or create interdependence and solidarity among men that enable them to dominate women” (Hartman, 1981, p. 192). Works Cited Hartmann, H. (1981). The Unhappy marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union. In C. R. McCann & S. Kim (Eds.), Feminist Theory Reader: Local and Global Perspectives (3rd ed.) (pp 182-201). Hewitt, N. (2001). Re-Rooting American Women’s Activism: Global Perspectives on 1848. In C. R. McCann & S. Kim (Eds.), Feminist Theory Reader: Local and Global Perspectives (3rd ed.) (pp 31-39). McCann, C. R. & Kim S. (2013), Feminist Theory Reader: Local and Global Perspectives (3rd ed.) (pp 11-27). McCann, C. R. & Kim S. (2013), Feminist Theory Reader: Local and Global Perspectives (3rd ed.) (pp 161-173).

Open Document