Doctor's Vignette In The Canterbury Tales

607 Words2 Pages

The Doctor’s vignette in Chaucer's prologue to The Canterbury Tales, is a satire of the medical profession during the Middle Ages in that it is corrupt and not trustworthy.
The Doctor is initially described as someone who has an abundance of knowledge about medicine, since “no one alive could talk as well as he did on points of medicine and surgery,” (p. 16). He is established as being more even more credible through a list of famous thinkers and scientists that he “was well versed in,” (p. 17). Medicine at this time was based on studies done by other scientists and so it would be appropriate for him to be well-versed in those studies. However, medicine was very rudimentary during this era. Common treatments included bleeding and leeches, which hypothetically would drain the illness from the patient’s system. These would not work since there were no blood transfusions, so patients would be very weak and could possibly …show more content…

The doctor would prescribe medicine for his patients and send them to an apothecary, whom he was working with. “All his apothecaries in a tribe were ready with the drugs he would prescribe and each made money from the other’s guile,” (p. 17). The Doctor would prescribe medicine that may not have been needed, just to make money. The patient would buy the medicine from an apothecary and the apothecary would give a cut to the doctor in return for the business. It is said at the end of the tale that the Doctor “therefore had a special love for gold,” (p. 17). He may have known everything there is to know about medicine, but that was just to build credibility so that his patients would trust him. He is a prime example of the corruption of the medical practice, since he rips off his patients in order to get gold. This happens on top of the already untruthfulness of medicine of the day, since most remedies just made the patient worse instead of

More about Doctor's Vignette In The Canterbury Tales

Open Document