Distefano's Guilt Summary

839 Words2 Pages

A third factor in the conclusion of DiStefano’s guilt is his statement of activities, it is extraordinarily unbalanced. True statements follow the same format as a lecture or story with three mostly equal parts, an introduction talking about the events leading to the crime, the crime itself and then a conclusion and aftermath. DiStefano’s statement, however, doesn’t follow this trend. He uses short sentences with little detail rounding to the nearest 5 or 10 minutes to describe most his day. Then when it comes to the period concerning the crime, he suddenly becomes very detailed in his whereabouts and what he did, giving detailed descriptions, down to the minute-12:03 AM. Then after the period surrounding the crime where an evenly sized conclusion …show more content…

The first issue is how he states the fact that he only gave a confession because he is tired and wanted to go home and be done. He assumed that they would let him confess to killing someone and leave. No reasonable person believes that they can confess to murder and then just walk away from a free man. In fact, he didn’t even believe this himself. For in preliminary hearings regarding the validity of the confession one of his arguments was that he thought he was in custody. He states how he felt like he couldn’t leave, there was no way they were going to let a murder suspect walk out of there and he is correct. However, he can’t have it both ways, he can’t reasonably say he thought he would be able to leave after confessing, but then also say that thought he wasn’t free to leave before he even confessed because he was a suspect. This issue is important because it dilutes the strength of his argument as to why he would give a false confession, simply you don’t confess to go home, you confess to go to prison. The other part of DiStefano’s logic which is problematic is how he argues the validity of his confession. He states how factual parts of the confession are wrong or uncorroborated and thus the whole confession must be wrong. However, just because part is wrong this doesn’t change the fact that he confessed, nor the fact that details can be wrong or falsified while the main idea, Christopher DiStefano …show more content…

He is guilty, the initial verdict was correct in that regard, but the PA Superior Court was also correct in overturning his conviction. DiStefano was the target of the investigation, it was made very clear in the interrogation process, and therefore, constitutionally, he needed to be given his Miranda Rights. Having not received those a craftily gotten confession gets thrown out. The outrageous oversight on the part of investigators took all the work on the investigation and wasted it. Without an admissible confession, there wasn’t much to convict him on so he pleas down and walks free, self-proclaimed a factually innocent

Show More
Related

  • Comparison Of Edgar Allan Poe: A Tale Of Two Narraations

    1523 Words  | 4 Pages

    In “The Tell-Tale Heart” and “The Cask of the Amontillado’ Montresor and the unknown narrator are both murders through their confessions they reveal both their similarities and differences. The unknown narrator is trying to convince the auditor of his sanity while Montresor is attempting to convince the auditor of justifiable revenge. It is through these confessions they are trying to convince the auditor of their humanity and of their innocence through the justification of these horrible acts (Dern 53).

    Read More

  • Chinese Culture Exposed in the Celebrated Cases of Judge Dee

    622 Words  | 2 Pages

    As Judge Dee begins solving the crimes, the story unfolds slowly and shows the reader the history of China. In the Celebrated Cases of Judge Dee, Judge Dee lived in the Tang dynasty. During this period, one can see how the Chinese authoritative views were strict, the laws and punishment which were enforced, and what the outlook on the Chinese society was. Authority had a strong hold on their community and the people in the town also confined in them to help them and solve crimes. The community also knew what the consequences of causing a crime was and that indeed it was wrong to omit a crime. Judge Dee and with the help of his associates, begins solving the crime through much observation and Judge Dee was very clever. He used methods and tools such as, going undercover, using underground sources, interrogation, and forensic science to solve his problems. It isn’t much different today on how we solve crime in the western world.

    Read More

  • The Spaniard Quietist Miguel de Molinos

    1801 Words  | 4 Pages

    was he really guilty as charged? Was Molinos a victim of the jealousy of the

    Read More

  • False Confessions and the Norfolk Four Case

    2738 Words  | 6 Pages

    ...ng Confessions: Speaking Guilt in Law and Literature. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2000. Print.

    Read More

  • The Reid Technique, Benfair, By Adam Benforado

    1823 Words  | 4 Pages

    Even those who should have a clear sense of the an interrogation, fail to see the coercion brought upon the suspect that might lead to a false confession, and once a confession has been made, false or true, detectives or police terminates their investigation that could have found potential evidence to exonerate them. Once a confession is obtained, police tend to ‘‘close’’ cases as solved and refuse to investigate other sources of evidence (Leo and Liu) which is why such a high number of innocent people still remain behind bars. Across samples, police-induced false confessions were evident in between 15 and 25% in cases, making it one of the likely leading causes of wrongful conviction (Leo and Liu), but still juries disregard this evidence! Unfortunately, more cases like Rivers are out there. According to the Washington Post, the National Registry ha logged 1,733 exonerating cases of false confession. In one case, a man by the name of Ricky Jackson spent four decades for a crime he did not commit, only to be exonerated by DNA evidence after 40 years. To emphasize, few states, if any at all, courts provides information to the jury regarding how to assess voluntariness, nor do

    Read More

  • Scarlet Letter Guilt Essay

    1824 Words  | 4 Pages

    Guilt is powerful thing. A person’s whole life can be destroyed seconds after being exposed to the strength of guilt. Even though admitting a sin can seem more difficult than not, that confession can often make a world of difference in the long run. In The Scarlet Letter, by Nathaniel Hawthorne, Hester Prynne, and Reverend Dimmesdale, have two very different ways of dealing with guilt. These differences in action are what change the courses of their lives. The actions taken by one character are successful, though the actions of the other put his life in ruins. Hester confesses her sin in public, while Dimmesdale does not. This simple choice made causes a drastic change in each of their lives. When comparing the lives of Hester and Dimmesdale,

    Read More

  • Guilt in Macbeth by William Shakespeare

    583 Words  | 2 Pages

    Everyone deals with guilt at least one time throughout their life, and several authors use guilt to help build up suspense in their story. Guilt in Macbeth not only affects his mental state of mind, but it also destroys him physically, along with a few other characters such as Lady Macbeth. The characters are affected by guilt so much, that it actually leads to their death essentially, just because they were not able to handle the consequences for the events that occurred. Despite being destroyed by guilt, they were still forced to carry on with their lives and they did have to try to hide it, even though Macbeth was not doing so well with that. His hallucinations were giving him up and eventually everyone knew the he had murdered Duncan so he could become the next king.

    Read More

  • Tragic Case of Ralph Tortorici

    884 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion, Ralph Tortorici’s trial was unfair. Through his history of anger and solitary that later lead to a severe illness, the lack of proper trial due to the reason that the prosecution should not have gone forward after there was clear evidence of Ralph’s unstable mental health and the lack of support for his paranoia schizophrenia are all factors that demonstrate why Ralph was given an unjust trial.

    Read More

  • Illusion versus Reality in The Tell Tale Heart

    1144 Words  | 3 Pages

    Firstly, at the end of this story, the narrator’s illusions are the most powerful pieces of evidence for his madness. It is his two illusions that betrays him and imposed him to confess the crime. His first illusion is the beating of the old man’s heart which actually did not exist. Initialy, exactly as he portrayed "My head ached, and I fancied a ringing in my ears, it continued and became more distinct", the ringing he heard haunted him ceaselessly. Then he "found that the noise was not within his ear", and thought the fancy in his ear was the beating of old man’s heart. Because of the increasing noise, he thought the officers must hear it, too. However, in fact, everything he heard is absurd and illusive. And it proves that the narrator is really insane. Next, his second illusion is the officers’ "hypocritical smiles" which pushed him to completely be out of control. Losting of his mind, he called the officer "Villains". Apparently, he was confused and falsely thought "they were making a mockery of his horror" which irritated him intensively. Consequently, he told all the truth and "admitted the deed" in order to get rid of the growing noise. Therefore, the above two pieces of evidence both reveal the truth that the narrator is absolutely insane in contrary to what the narrator tried to tell us.

    Read More

  • Ernesto Miranda V. Arizona

    1501 Words  | 4 Pages

    Ernesto Miranda grew up not finishing high school. He didn’t finish the 9th grade, and he decided to drop out of school during that year. He also had a criminal record and had pronounced sexual fantasies after dropping out of high school. Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Phoenix in 1963. He had raped an 18 yr. girl who was mildly mentally handicapped in March of 1963. He was charged with rape, kidnapping, and robbery. When he was found and arrested, and he was not told of his rights before interrogation. After two hours of interrogation, the cops and detectives had a written confession from Miranda that he did do the crimes that he was acquitted for. Miranda also had a history mental instability, and had no counsel at the time of the trial. The prosecution at the trial mainly used his confession as evidence. Miranda was convicted of both counts of rape and kidnapping. He was sentenced to 20-30 years in prison. He tried to appeal to the Supreme Court in

    Read More

  • Guilt in Charles Brockden Browns’ Wieland

    944 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are many ways to decide what makes a man guilty. In an ethical sense, there is more to guilt than just committing the crime. In Charles Brockden Browns’ Wieland, the reader is presented with a moral dilemma: is Theodore Wieland guilty of murdering his wife and children, even though he claims that the command came from God, or is Carwin guilty because of his history of using persuasive voices, even though his role in the Wieland family’s murder is questionable? To answer these questions, one must consider what determines guilt, such as responsibility, motives, consequences, and the act itself. No matter which view is taken on what determines a man’s guilt, it can be concluded that Wieland bears the fault in the murder of Catharine Wieland and her children.

    Read More

  • The Lasting Effect of Sin and Guilt on Hester and Dimmesdale

    1448 Words  | 3 Pages

    Without an honorable reputation a person is not worthy of respect from others in their society. In Nathaniel Hawthorne’s novel, The Scarlet Letter, the struggle to shake off the past is an underlying theme throughout the novel. Characters in this novel go through their lives struggling with trying to cope with the guilt and shame associated with actions that lost them their honorable reputation. Particularly, Hawthorne shows the lasting effect that sin and guilt has on two of the main characters in the book: Hester Prynne and Reverend Dimmesdale.

    Read More

  • In a Grove

    394 Words  | 1 Pages

    It is a story that provides the ultimate explanation of how two different people who are witnesses to a crime give completely different psychological recollections of the same event. The author reminds us that truth depends on the telling. Someone must step forward and tell that truth.

    Read More

  • Court Observations In Criminal Observation Essay

    1586 Words  | 4 Pages

    The sala of Judge Cresencio Tan was kind enough to allow us to observe cases where evidences were presented in the form of witnesses and documents. The first case was simple enough as it was for the initial reception of the prosecution’s evidence. In this proceeding, the prosecutor merely requested for the markings of the evidences she presented in court and the counsel for the accused was asked if he admits it or not. I was waiting for some evidence that would not be admitted by the counsel for the accused in order to see what would happen next, however, all evidences were admitted. With that, that particular session ended. The second case called was for the continuation of reception of prosecution’s evidence. In this case, a witness was presented and the counsel for the accused addressed the witness. I observed that his line of questioning was set on establishing doubt in relation to his personal knowledge of the crime and the drugs in question. The counsel for the accused was able to establish that since the witness himself admitted that he was not really there during the arrest. This case illustrated to me the importance of the element of personal knowledge of a a crime in the determination of a person’s

    Read More

  • Confronting Guilt In Franz Kafka’s The Trial

    1287 Words  | 3 Pages

    If we are to be truly innocent and humble beings, we must recognize our own innate guilt as human and accept it. If we do not, we will constantly be obsessed by our “state of apparent acquittals”. Kafka, Franz. A. The Trial. Trans.

    Read More

More about Distefano's Guilt Summary

Open Document