Disparate Treatment: An Illegal Discrimination Case

2725 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Discrimination in the workplace

Illegal discrimination which is also called disparate treatment, means that raters assign scores differentially to various employees based on factors that are not performance related, such as race, nationality, color, or ethnic and national origin. As a result of such ratings, some employees receive more training, feedback, or rewards than others. More so, illegal discrimination is usually referred to as disparate treatment because employees claim they were intentionally treated differently because of their sex, race, ethnicity, national origin, age, disability status, or other protected classes under the law (Aguinis, 2013).

Essentially, the majority of legal cases involving performance management systems involve a claim of disparate treatment. …show more content…

v. Green. In this influential case, the court established the logical framework to determine whether employment discrimination occurred due to disparate treatment. Hence, to prove a prima facie case in an employment discrimination case based on disparate treatment, a claimant must show that they are a member of a lawful protected class who applied for and was qualified for a position but was rejected based on their protected …show more content…

If the claimant is successful in proving a prima facie case of disparate treatment, the burden shifts to the employer to articulate some legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for the employee's rejection of the job seeker. If the employer is successful, the burden shifts back to the job seeker to prove that the employer's legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the decision is merely a pretext for discrimination. This standard can be incredibly difficult to meet. The difficulty in proving intentional discrimination necessary for a disparate treatment claim is that most employers today are quite astute and sharp about discrimination. Essentially, rather than using obvious communication directly showing a discriminatory intent, employers and employment agencies may use code words to exclude some job seekers from consideration. Therefore, discriminatory intent or motive must be proven to win a disparate treatment claim, which is a high burden for any job seeker who has been excluded from consideration (Jolly-Ryan,

Show More
Related

  • Aquino Vs Honda Summary

    813 Words  | 2 Pages

    Title VII of The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on race, color, national origin, gender, or religion. Race, color, national origin, gender, and religion are known as protected classes. The Supreme Court later established “several theories of discrimination that plaintiffs may purses based on the type of discrimination alleged.” (Melvin & Katz, 2015) The three most common theories are disparate treatment, mixed motives, and disparate impact. Aquino v. Honda is an example of disparate treatment as Aquino believe his was terminated, thus discriminated against, because of his race. Disparate Treatment is defined as “overt and intentional discrimination.” (Melvin & Katz, 2015)The burden of proof was on Honda to prove it had legitimate reason to terminate Aquino. The court ruled that Honda had met the burden of proof; the firing was not discriminatory as the accusations were not baseless nor did they amount to pretext. When the burned shifted back to Aquino to prove his firing was discriminatory in nature, he could not provide any

    Read More

  • Griggs V Duke Power Case Study

    874 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the case of Griggs vs. Duke Power Company the Supreme Court of the United States found the Duke Power Company liable for violating the civil rights of thirteen African American employees of Duke Power Company. This was a result of the Duke Power Company intradepartmental transfer policy requirements of a high school education and achieving a minimum scores on two aptitude tests. The intrade direct violation because the power company could not link the intradepartmental transfer policy to benefit or predict the how the employee will lead and serve Duke Power Company. Disparate treatment is the matter of proof. The plaintiff alleging direct, intentional discrimination must first be able to establish a prima facie case and second, he or she is able to establish that the employer was acting on the basis of a discriminatory motive (Caruth).The class action suit, on the behalf of the thirteen African American employees, resulted in a unanimous ruling in favor of Griggs, Duke Power Company.

    Read More

  • Interpreting The Mccleskey V. Kemp (1983) Decision

    1716 Words  | 4 Pages

    In order to prove the existence of purposeful discrimination, McCleskey must first demonstrate that he belonged to a group “that is a recognizable, distinct class, singled out for different treatment” (McCleskey v. Kemp 318). Here, McCleskey relied on the Baldus study,...

    Read More

  • Disparate Impact

    1393 Words  | 3 Pages

    Disparate Impact arises when an employer's practices unintentionally excludes a protected class disproportionately (Player, Shoben and Lieberwitz, 1995). A "protected class" is a group of people, with common characteristics, which Congress has determined must be protected from inequality ("On-the-Job Discrimination: Gender Discrimination," 2004). This paper will analyze the landmark disparate impact case of Griggs v. Duke Power Co. (401 U.S. 424, 1971) from its beginning to its conclusion in the Supreme Court. Included will be the facts of the case and the issues detailed, as well as the history of the case from initial filing to final ruling.

    Read More

  • Racial Inequality in America

    872 Words  | 2 Pages

    In today’s world, the American still has barriers to overcome in the matter of racial equality. Whether it is being passed over for a promotion at the job or being underpaid, some people have to deal with unfair practice that would prevent someone of color or the opposite sex from having equal opportunity at the job. In 2004, Dukes vs. Wal-Mart Stores Incorporation was a civil rights class-action suite that ruled in favor of the women who worked and did not received promotions, pay and certain job assignments. This proves that some corporations ignore the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which protects workers from discrimination based on sex, race, religion or national origin.

    Read More

  • Discrimination Case Study

    1057 Words  | 3 Pages

    Discrimination, in one form or another, goes on everyday in the world around us. Discrimination affects all of us whether we are aware of it or not. Discrimination is defined as “unjustified differential treatment, especially on the basis of characteristics such as race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, or religion” (MacKinnon). According to Eugene Lee of California Labor and Employment Law “racial discrimination and racial harassment” are the most popular complaint when it come to discrimination in the United States.

    Read More

  • Disparate Treatment

    1099 Words  | 3 Pages

    Disparate treatment is a form of discrimination that is forbidden by laws in which all employers must comply, including fire and emergency services. Disparate treatment in the workplace is applicable to many functions of the workplace including, discipline, promotions, hiring, firing, benefits, layoffs, and testing (Varone, 2012). The claim of disparate treatment arises when a person or group, “is treated differently because of a prohibited classification” (Varone, 2012, p. 439). In the 2010 case, Lewis v. City of Chicago, six plaintiffs accused the city of disparate treatment following testing for open positions within the Chicago Fire Department (Lewis v. City of Chicago, 2010). The case is based on the argument that the Chicago Fire Department firefighter candidate testing, which was conducted in 1995, followed an unfair process of grouping eligible candidates, therefore discriminating against candidates of African-American decent. The case was heard by the Seventh District Court of Appeals and ultimately appeared before the United States Supreme Court, where Justice Scalia delivered the final verdict in favor of the plaintiffs.

    Read More

  • The Workplace and Title Seven

    1165 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the catalyst in abolishing the separate but equal policies that had been a mainstay in our society. Though racial discrimination was the initial focal point, its enactment affected every race. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in housing, education, employment, public accommodations and the receipt of federal funds based on certain discrimination factors such as race, color, national origin, sex, disability, age or religion. Title VII is the employment segment of the Civil Rights Act and is considered one of the most important aspects of legislation that has helped define the employment law practices in this country. Prior to Title VII, an employer could hire and fire an employee for any given reason. Title VII prohibits discrimination in hiring, firing, training, promotion, discipline or other workplace decisions. (Bennett-Alexander-Hartman, Fourth Edition, pp 85) Though it applies to everyone, its enactment was especially significant to women and minorities, who until its passage had limited recourse in harassment based discriminations in the workplace.

    Read More

  • Martha Minow Making All The Difference Summary

    1978 Words  | 4 Pages

    Canada (2003), the applicant alleged discrimination with respect to employment on the ground of race and colour. The Ontario Human Rights Commission recognized that employers have a duty to provide a safe working environment to its employees insofar as racial harassment should not be tolerated as it infringes the person’s basic human right to not be discriminated against. The Court determined that racial slurs and discrimination should not be tolerated in any case. Arguably, this case should have been a systemic complaint than an individual complaint even though the court cannot dismiss an individual claimant. The defense put forward, in this case, is of significance as the clean hands doctrine was applied to justify the employers’ action. However, the clean hand doctrine was dismissed as the action of the applicant had no correlation with the issue of discrimination. The employer argued that the appellant did poorly in the interview process and that his intention was not racially motivated. The Ontario Commission acknowledged that there was a problem with the documentation about race and racism. There was a lack of data to support or disprove the claim that the organization’s actions were discriminatory towards racialized persons. Additionally, it is difficult to determine who were receiving good assignments and who were not. This case reassures that a motive is not needed for discrimination to take place as the only thing that is important is the unconscious act itself is racist. Phrased differently, the motivation of the organization is

    Read More

  • Race Based Employment Discrimination

    1220 Words  | 3 Pages

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and various other federal and state laws prohibit intentional discrimination based on ancestry or ethnicity. Some employers practice blatant forms of minority discrimination by paying lower salaries and other compensation to blacks and Hispanics. Others engage in quota systems by denying promotions and jobs to individuals on the basis of race or color. Federal laws prohibit employers of 15 or more employees from discriminating on the basis of race or color. Virtually all states have even stronger anti-discrimination laws directed to fighting job-related race and minority discrimination. In some states, companies with fewer than eight employees can be found guilty of discrimination.

    Read More

  • Racial Discrimination in the Workplace

    1557 Words  | 4 Pages

    Introduction- Discrimination affects people all over the world. People of all ethnicities and from all different walks of life are influenced in some way by workplace discrimination. "Discrimination" means unequal treatment. One of the most common elements discriminated against is a persons ethnicity, or their race. This is called Racial Discrimination. While there are many federal laws concerning discrimination, most states have enacted laws that prohibit it. These laws may have different remedies than the federal laws and may, in certain circumstances be more favorable than the federal laws.

    Read More

  • Functional Discrimination Case Study

    917 Words  | 2 Pages

    Discrimination is known to exist in all workplaces, sometimes it is too subtle to notice, and other times it is exceedingly obvious. It is known that everyone subconsciously discriminates, dependant on their own beliefs and environments that surround them. However, discrimination can be either positive or negative in their results, and sometimes discrimination is a necessary part of life.

    Read More

  • What Is Discrimination In The Workplace Essay

    1075 Words  | 3 Pages

    All over the world, we hear about people treating each other prejudicially depending on their background, ethnicity, or sex orientation. Workplaces should be free from all personal biases but unfortunately, we hear about employees being discriminated against, almost, on a daily basis. Workplace discrimination can be described as treating an individual or a group of people differently than others. It also can take more serious and threatening forms such as sexual harassment. It can be expressed in the form of offensive jokes, unwelcomed body contacts, inappropriate gestures, or even direct sexual contact.

    Read More

  • Essay On Age Discrimination

    1621 Words  | 4 Pages

    Work plays an important role in our daily life, it is considered much more huge part of our personal life. During our daily work we make many relationships throughout our career history. Sometimes these relationships become lasting, and sometimes employment discrimination might happen. This relationships that we thought it last could be cut off by the devastation of claims of discriminatory treatment. Discrimination in the workforce has been an issue since the first people of workers in United States in the present day and as well in the past. Some employees were subjected to a harsh working conditions, verbal abuse, denial of advancement,, and many other injustices. There was also the fact that certain employees were being treated differently than other employees.

    Read More

  • Harassment and Discrimination in the Workplace

    1089 Words  | 3 Pages

    Harassment and discrimination can affect a business in many ways. Having a history of harassment and discrimination claims can damage a business’ reputation and affect its bottom line. It can cost the business current and future clients as well as investors and employees. Depending on the gravity of the claim(s), the process of settling the claim(s) can take anywhere from months to years. Meanwhile, the cost of the settlement and other fees continue to add up. A business might have to compensate the affected parties besides paying court fees and lawyers. The EEOC has seen a rise in monetary rewards from 7.5 million to 24.3 million (Glazer, 1996) However, all of these can be avoided by properly educating employers and employees about their rights and what harassment and discrimination entails.

    Read More

More about Disparate Treatment: An Illegal Discrimination Case

Open Document