Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Oppression and discrimination through race
Implications of oppression
Oppression and discrimination through race
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Oppression and discrimination through race
Prompt #3 In “Discourse on Colonialism,” Aimé Césaire points out the similarities between Nazism and colonization. He takes the approach that the main difference between the two is that one happened to Africa and the other happened to Europe. In the Congo, brutality that took a different form than, but that can quite easily be compared to the holocaust took place under the rule of King Leopold II. Similarly, black South Africans were forced to abide by pass laws and were massacred at peaceful demonstrations. While the discriminatory violence was carried out differently in South Africa, the Congo, and through Nazism, all are comparable in that they involved one society dominating another society due to a sense of superiority. As Césaire bluntly …show more content…
In World War II, there was a great deal of dehumanization and a separation between the victims and the perpetrators. In the Congo, physically cutting off the hand of someone else is extremely personal. Apart from treating the Congolese people as subhuman, it is difficult to separate the person to whom one is causing pain and mutilation from the act of cutting off someone’s hand as a trophy. The biggest difference in how the two acts of violence are treated in history is that one despicable act affected white Europeans and the other affected black …show more content…
Those who opposed colonial rule were often arrested and tortured or starved until they died. The cause of death was not always reported truthfully. Additionally peaceful protests over injustices such as the pass laws ended in bloodshed. For example, “on 21 March 1960police in Sharpville, a black township fifty miles south of Johannesburg, opened fire on a crowd of PAC demonstrators, killing 69 and wounding 186. Most of the casualties were shot in the back as they fled the gunfire” (Meredith 122). The retreating Africans were massacred without a second thought just as the Jewish people were killed in Germany with little to no hesitation. When a group of people are dehumanized and separated into a “them” rather than remain part of the “us” it can easily lead to discriminatory action and
“Leopold had to recruit not just Belgians like Leon Rom, but young white men from throughout Europe, attracting them by such get-rich-quick incentives [...]” Much of the torture that Africans faced was due to either not producing enough rubber, killing the vine, or not being productive and efficient enough. “Although some whites in the Congo enjoyed wielding the chicotte, most put a similar symbolic distance between themselves and the dreaded instrument.” Hochschild used first-hand accounts from the very people who committed these atrocities in order to illustrate how desensitized they became, and how they saw it as nothing more than their obligation, that it was needed in order to be successful and prosperous.
History aims to examine the actions and legacy of mankind. The past is filled with the achievements that humans have reached, however, history also shows us the evil that man is capable of. No atrocity against mankind is more heinous than the act of genocide. Genocide is the aim to destroy all (or part of) of a racial, religious, ethnic, or national group of people. This paper will examine two famous cases of genocide in history: The holocaust of Jews and other groups in Nazi Germany, and the destruction of the Congolese people under Belgian colonialism. The Holocaust remains as one of the main legacies of Hitler and the Nazi party, who claimed an estimated 11 million victims, 6 million of which were Jews. Comparatively, the Congolese Genocide
A. Adu Boahen's African Perspectives on Colonialism neatly classifies African responses to European colonialism during both phases of invasion and occupation during the 19th century with precise labels according to their nature or time period. However, the reactions can also be loosely grouped into two diametric characterizations: peaceful and violent. Although creating this dichotomy seems a gross generalization and oversimplification of the colonial African experience, it more importantly allows for a different perspective- one that exposes the overwhelming success of the typically peaceful or pacifist reaction in contrast to the little gain and large losses of the violent response.
The acts of violence that were performed by rebels in Africa were horrific. Adults and children were murdered, mutilated, tortured, and raped. The Revolutionary United Front (RUF) in Sierra Leone performed despicable acts of cutting off a people's body parts with machetes to instill fear in the community. If you were working in the diamond mines and not performing up to the standards of the rebels you would lose a body part as punishment. Rebels would continue to do this from one village to another in order “to take control of the mines in the area” (Hoyt). It is estimated that in Sierra Leone that over 20,000 people suffered mutilation. The acts that the rebels performed to these innocent victims was clearly a violation to their human rights. The RUF collected 125 million a year to fund their war on the government and the people of Sierra Leone.
The results of European colonialism shows that the aim of colonialism is to exploit the human and economic resources of an area to benefit the colonizing nation. As a result, the nation that is colonized is affected negatively. In reality, how Europe really affected Africa as a whole is much
But many perceived that wasn’t the vindication for such a gruesome punishment. This massacre was all about Terrorizing and Demoralizing the African-Americans, through Racial Terror Lynchings. The vexation of white people grew towards the proletariat African-Americans, who they reckoned to be as their property or belonging.
During Imperialistic times South Africa was a region of great resources that was greatly disputed over (Ellis). Europe’s main goal during these times was to compete against each other and played a “game” of which country can imperialize more African countries than the other. Imperialism was a curse to South Africa, because many wars, laws, and deaths were not necessary and would not have happened if South Africa were not imperialized.
Sometime I think about the problems and effects that colonialism have caused in the whole world. Is it good or bad? “Colonialism has always had a bad reputation” (1). I suppose in essence, for the people being colonized, it cannot be a good thing. The world wide scramble for colonies, particularly in the late 19 early 20th centaury, had a tremendous negative effects on the economic, social, and political structures of indigenous, non-industrialized people. The idea of colonialism is to take resources from one country to use for the benefit of the colonizing country. “Colonialism is the extension of a nation's sovereignty over territory and people outside its own boundaries, often to facilitate economic domination over their resources, labor, and markets. The term also refers to a set of beliefs used to legitimize or promote this system, especially the belief that the mores of the colonizer are superior to those of the colonized.”(2). Some may argue they did it out of religion: to spread the gospel. But in reality, it comes from the power to fight back within Europe. It is a competition in resources, military muscles, political programs, at a time when Europe began its successful age.
In the colonization era, egocentrism was strongly enforced, as the norm was Christianity. If an individual was not Christian, then they were seen as animals and ruthless treatment was acceptable. Statistics show that “The population of the Belgian Congo fell by fifty percent and that of the Herero’s by eighty percent as a result of the oppressive and inhuman t...
...arateness, culturally and historically, and the advantages of maintaining these demarcations, which was an effective way of checking coordinated groups’ dissidence against colonial rule (Campbell 1997). This colonial policy heightened groups’ senses of exclusiveness and distinctiveness. These ideals created the clientalism in some African governments. Neo-colonialism survived because the West had established a dependent economic and political structure on the continent which was inherited and never changed by the new leaders. These “ambassadors” of the colonizers promoted foreign interest over domestic interest, maintaining the economic and political structures of the colonizers. They manipulated their followers to support and uphold neo-colonialism. This relationship is also highlighted when ethnicity is considered as a tool of manipulation for political elites.
While the economic and political damage of the scramble for Africa crippled the continent’s social structure, the mental warfare and system of hierarchy instituted by the Europeans, made the continent more susceptible to division and conquest. The scramble for partition commenced a psychological warfare, as many Africans were now thrust between the cultural barriers of two identities. As a result, institutions for racial inferiority became rooted in the cultural identity of the continent. This paper will expound on the impact of colonialism on the mental psyche of Africans and the employment of the mind as a means to seize control. I will outline how the mental hierarchy inculcated by the Europeans paved the way for their “divide and conquer” tactic, a tool essential for European success. Through evidence from a primary source by Edgar Canisius and the novel, King Leopold’s Ghost, I will show how colonial influences heightened the victimization of Africans through psychological means. I will culminate by showing how Robert Collins fails to provide a holistic account of colonialism, due to his inability to factor in the use of psychological warfare as a means to the end. By dissecting the minds of both the colonizer and the colonized, I hope to illustrate the susceptibility of African minds to European influences and how psychological warfare transformed Africans from survivors to victims during colonialism.
Readings allow responders to create meaning of the text and compose within their own and others context. Exploration of "Feminist", "Freudian" , and "Marxist" readings allows the readers to view certain concepts and explore themes from various different perspectives. All these readings encompass certain thematic concerns, from which a certain degree of parallelism from each perspective can be established, as well as differing concepts and issues.
This report will explore the theoretical approach of Post-colonialism in economic development. The report with the help of India as a case study will aim to explain how the theory of Post-colonialism has shaped understanding and approaches to international development.
An overwhelming majority of African nations has reclaimed their independence from their European mother countries. This did not stop the Europeans from leaving a permanent mark on the continent however. European colonialism has shaped modern-day Africa, a considerable amount for the worse, but also some for the better. Including these positive and negative effects, colonialism has also touched much of Africa’s history and culture especially in recent years.
I believe that colonial mentality is very much existent in the Philippines and to modern-day Filipinos. If our everyday lifestyle is analyzed and looked upon, it is quite noticeable that a majority of our actions were developed by the influences of our previous colonizers. I have to admit also that it affects me in my everyday living. However, I think that Colonial mentality may be curbed by having a change of mindset in the hearts of modern-day Filipinos. I see that most of us lack love for the country and I think that problem can be