Digital Photography In Law Enforcement

1155 Words3 Pages

Digital photography continues to rapidly expand into the every day practices of criminal justice professionals. Crime scenes are full of evidence waiting to be placed inside a sealed bag and stored into evidence. Consequently not everything can be sealed and stored. In addition once the area of the crime has had things moved or touched by investigators then the scene is never the same. Furthermore digital photography helps preserve the scene and the evidence from further temperament. Consequently this paper will discuss the topic of digital imaging and when it is considered in law enforcement. In addition this paper will also discuss the court such as the legality behind these photographs admissibility and also whether a crime scene photographer can be considered as an expert witness.
A crime scene is something that photographs are needed for. Furthermore, as photographs evolved and became more detailed they have been used to document close up evidence as well. Subsequently, this physical evidence can include things …show more content…

In regards to the state of Florida, photographs have been ruled to be admissible for a long time, as long as the pictures are relevant to the case. In addition, the state of Florida also states that a photograph may be admissible in court under the ‘pictorial testimony’ theory. This is when a witness verifies that the evidence accurately represents the subject matter of the case. The witness’s verification is based on their own personal observation. Once the photographs are deemed as relevant for the case, the final hurdle that must be conquered is the authenticity. This is done by the offering party showing the picture to the witness in the court room. To continue, they will then ask the witness “does this photograph fairly and accurately depict [subject]”. If the adverse party does not challenge the photograph then it is

Open Document