Differences Of Thomas Paine And James Chalmers

1169 Words3 Pages

The American colonists under English rule had many rules and regulations dictated by the king and his governors that the colonists were not enthused about. The colonists eventually grew very tired of how England was ruling them and they were on the verge of making a huge decision; to fight for independence from England or to remain a colony. Two men, Thomas Paine and James Chalmers, would offer two opposing stances on this issue. Paine would write his letter Common Sense in 1776, arguing that becoming independent from England would make America stronger economically and politically as a nation, while Chalmers wrote his letter Plain Truth in 1776, arguing that to be a strong nation economically and politically the American colonists would …show more content…

Chalmers argued that should the colonists gain independence from England their trading abilities would collapse and their economy would fail. He believed that to trade in the European market there needed to be political ties and contracts signed to be an established trade nation, and while the colonists had all of these luxuries under English rule, once they were independent they would not be part of the established trade network. Chalmers believed “The greatest part of our plank, staves, shingles, hoops, corn, beef, pork, herrings, and many other articles, could find no vent, but in the English Islands,” and without England to trade with the colonist’s trade network would be depleted and would fail along with their economy very rapidly (James Chalmers, Plain Truth, 117). Paine of course believed that independence from England would make the economy of the colonies flourish. He argued that the land of America was bountiful and profitable enough to boost the American economy in the trade markets of Europe. Unlike Chalmers, Paine believed that “As Europe is our market for trade, we ought to form no political connection with any part of it,” as this would make the American colonies unbiased and would be a better business decision (Paine, Common Sense, 108). In this situation, …show more content…

The distance between the colonies and England is what led to most of the political strife in 1776. Paine argued that having a government so far away trying to rule from was deplorable. He urged colonists to be outraged, as he was, that when any issue would arise it would take 3-4 months for the English government to find a solution and start working on fixing the problem. Paine called for independence to create a government that would be run by the people and for the people, not by one single tyrannical leader. He rallied for a government that was in America and that had representatives from every one of the colonies so that all the colonist’s voices would be heard. Paine urged the colonists to see “Our prayers have been rejected with disdain; and hath tended to convince us that nothing flatters vanity or confirms obstinacy in Kings more than repeated petitioning”, and it was now time to fight for independence to create a government that would listen (Paine, Common Sense,

Open Document