Differences Between The Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution

1323 Words3 Pages

The New Government: The Articles of Confederation and The Constitution After gaining its independence from England the United States, required a government. The first attempt to create a national government led to the formation of the Articles of Confederation. Though short-lived, the Articles of Confederation marked an important step in the formation of the US government. The Articles of Confederation were ratified by the states in 1781 after approval by Congress in 1777 (Johnson, 2003). The main objective of the Articles of Confederation was to unite different states and form a common national government (Johnson, 2003). As a result of their formation, the Articles set up a confederation which gave more power to the states. However, the Articles of Confederation were perceived to be weak and lacked the required power to run the country effectively. As a result, problems arose which led to the development of the New Constitution in 1787 which advocated for a government with more unity and power. …show more content…

In the Articles of Confederation, the legislature was formed as a unicameral legislature while in the new constitution, the legislature was bicameral consisting of an Upper House, Lower House, the Senate, and the House of Representatives (Haworth, 2010). The change in structure of the legislature happened because the states wanted the representatives to be selected in different ways. In addition, all the states were represented equally under the Articles of Confederation (Haworth, 2010). As a result, the bigger states felt that they were entitled to more decision-making power on some of the decisions made by the country which angered the smaller states this led to the development of the Virginia

Open Document