Difference Between Liberalism And Neoliberalism

1251 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Principles of neoliberalism

Introduction:
Although the Cold War seems to be an ideological rivalry between the capitalism and capitalism, it accidentally catalyzes a great myriad of transnational cooperation and the reinvention of liberalism. Liberalism has evolved to be a dominant political ideology, neoliberalism, since 1970s. The notion of neoliberalism is that transnational institutions are conducive to global changes, harmony and prosperity through launching international programme. Differed from other theories solely recognizing the sovereign states as the only actor, neoliberalism also emphasizes the participation of other actors, such as the transnational corporations (TNC), which are the enterprises conduct economic activities or production of goods and services in multiple states, and non-governmental organizations (NGO). Besides, neoliberalism does not only attend to high-political issues, for instances, collective security, but also the low-politics in economic and cultural aspects. In the light of the main theme of neoliberalism, one may also conclude globalization is beneficial to all. Still, globalization would also engender some challenges, for instances, the North/ South division, to all. Therefore, this thesis destines …show more content…

As mentioned by Adam Smith, international free trade is a tactic to avoid interstate wars. Owing to the fact that economic globalization intertwines states’ economic growth. Given that a war breaks out between these states, strategic trading path may be blocked or destroyed. If trade interlinks the warring states’ economies, war would become a no-win situation for players in the game in the economic sense that their trade would be devastated. The players would definitely denounce war as a mean to address any issues under the assumption that they are rational enough to prioritize economic interest. If so, collective security can be more

Show More
Related

  • Neoliberalissm In Latin America Essay

    1343 Words  | 3 Pages

    With the removal of an authoritarian rule, the transnational oriented elites rose to power and have been given “ the opportunity to reorganize the state and build a better institutional framework to deepen neoliberal adjustments” (Robinson 180). Politically, the program changes the control of the political system to less direct coercive rule. Economically, it eliminated state intervention in the economy; this allowed the adjusting of local economies to serve the global economy instead of their

    Read More

  • Neoliberalism in Brazil

    1298 Words  | 3 Pages

    Neoliberalism is a form of economic liberalism that emphasizes the efficiency of private enterprise, liberalized trade, and relatively open markets. Neoliberals seek to maximize the role of the private sector in determining the political/economic priorities of the world and are generally supporters of economic globalization. During the 1930s and the late 1970s most Latin American countries used the import substitution industrialization model to build industry and reduce dependency on imports from foreign countries. The result of the model in these c...

    Read More

  • Neoliberism

    589 Words  | 2 Pages

    The turn to neoliberalism began after the Second World War. The restructuring of state forms and of international relations was intended to prevent a return to conditions that occurred in the 1930s. It was supposed to avoid the recurrence of inter-state geopolitical rivalries that triggered the war. After both capitalism and communism failed, the only way to move forward was to create the right mixture of state, market, and democratic institutions to guarantee peace, inclusion, well-being, and stability according...

    Read More

  • Classical Liberalism VS Classical Conservatism

    2066 Words  | 5 Pages

    Are you Republican or Democrat? Maybe you are Conservative or Liberal? What do these terms mean and how did they begin? Classical Conservatism is defined as “a political philosophy emphasizing the need for the principles of natural law and transcendent moral order.”(Frohnen, Beer, and Nelson, 2006) Classical Liberalism is described as “a philosophy committed to the ideal of limited government and liberty of individuals including freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and free markets.” (Hudelson, 1999) These two ideas have shaped our philosophies and parties for centuries to come. These philosophies were made possible by many bright men of the time like Edmund Burke, John Adams, John Locke and Adam Smith.

    Read More

  • neo-Gramscian

    1879 Words  | 4 Pages

    Neo Gramsican is a critical approach to the study of International Relations and the global political economy. It explores many elements that are essential for the maintenance of the international relations. It explores the interface of ideas, institutional and material capabilities as they form the specify shape of the state formation. Neo Gramsican analyzes how the grouping of social forces defines the sustainability of the world orders. Cox’s perspective on Neo- Gramscian is about the transformation of the main forms of state and their change under the pressure from the forces from world order and civil society.

    Read More

  • Liberalism vs. Conservatism

    606 Words  | 2 Pages

    Democratic representatives scream about "right-wing conspiracy" while radio talk shows lament the evil of "liberal agenda." News broadcasters are branded as "chauvinist conservatives" by Hollywood pundits or "liberal bigots" by Christian broadcasting. Everywhere someone is firing the label gun plastering liberal or conservative on their opponents and many Americans are scratching their heads trying to understand the division and difference between both.

    Read More

  • Keohane And Martin's Theory Of Neo-Liberalism And Neorealism

    1038 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although UN faces myriad challenges when get states together to follow UN’s norms and “blueprints”, it becomes progressively geared towards its ‘utopian’ goal ,during the time that the UN struggle to coordinate the states’ action and keep the international community in peace. Neo-liberalists are also argued that the international organisations like UN represent a liberal self-understanding and a liberal vision of the role which has shaped the international order in terms of decolonisation, human rights, environmental protection and international law. Neo-liberalists highlighted the significance of the cooperation between UN and regional organizations, as these regional organisations become inseparable in the process of international diplomatic predicting, “the international community will increasingly direct itself towards combined action of the universal Organization with regional bodies.” (Cassese: 2005: 338) This Link can be found between the UN and other regional organizations such as the European Union, Association of South East Asian Nations, the African Union, the Arab League and so on. This is widely regarded by neon-liberalists as they believe IOs are able to reformulate the behaviour of States. It is also proved the failure of neorealism that who underestimate the utility and wide influence of international organizations,. Further discussion about their motivations to how IOs influence States conduct by both promoting cooperation amongst members whilst at the same time putting the leash on those with non-cooperative behaviours, like trade sanctions. Navari argue that once cooperation amongst States is institutionalised, States would be cautious to leave it, because they fear of the uncertain consequences. (Navari: 2009: 39) European Union is a good example, as once European countries take part in the formal membership they have been

    Read More

  • Comparative Analysis of Globalisation Theories: Liberal, Marxist, and Neorealist Perspectives

    1967 Words  | 4 Pages

    The purpose of this essay is to examine the similarities and differences between the liberal, Marxist and neorealist approaches to globalisation theory. To coherently present the ways in which these approaches compliment and combine, this essay will focus on four points of discussion. Firstly, economic factors of globalisation in relation to liberal, marxist and neorealist approaches will be outlined and debated. In the second part, the role of the state from each perspective shall be examined. Thirdly, the way that issues of international relations are addressed will be discussed. Finally, the Eurocentric nature of these approaches will be presented. I shall attempt to maintain that although there are differences regarding the perceptions

    Read More

  • Neoliberalism Essay

    1396 Words  | 3 Pages

    Over the past decades,the type of economy that has been adopted is neoliberalism. Neoliberalism creates an unstable economy to third world countries, but benefits the first world countries. Neoliberalism could be seen as the practice of unchain, liberate and free from all government boundaries and any rules that could affect the economy between the first world and the third world countries. The mandatory and regulations of the enforcements of the international and in country government associations like International Monetary Fund (IMF)and the World Trade Organization (WTO) are the causes of privatization of markets to happen. This leaves third world countries at the bottom of the global economy and as a result, they are not given the opportunity to develop economically. The cause of this is neoliberal policies since the era of colonialism has reinforced the unequal powers between the first world and third world countries.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Liberal And Liberalism

    706 Words  | 2 Pages

    These two political ideologies offer to government leaders, policy makers, and thoughtful citizens a set of guides permitting some semblance of coherent conclusions regarding compelling social, economic and political issues. Their common features include rejection of radicalism and its attending violent uprooting of established instructions and practices, acceptance of the need for restraints on the powers of government, advocacy of balance in society regarding individual rights and social powers, and ultimately some root concerns for individual dignity. Most certainly disagreement abounds between the two woe within the same government framework. This agreement to disagree in a civil manner surely constitutes one of mankind’s most noble achievements.

    Read More

  • Classical Liberalism And Neoliberalism

    713 Words  | 2 Pages

    Neoliberalism is an updated version of the classical liberal economic idea that was predominant in the United States and the Great Britain prior to the Great Depression of the 1930s. “Interventionist” approach came into in the middle of 1930s to 1970s and replaced the classical liberalism; where to be viable, capitalism is believed to require a substantial state regulation. Corporate enterprises had assisted in creating wealthy class in society after the World War II, which enjoyed excessive political influence on their government in the United States and Europe. These wealthy elites supported neoliberalism as a base in order to counteract post-war policies that favored the working class and the welfare state.

    Read More

  • Neoliberalism In International Relations

    1486 Words  | 3 Pages

    Neoliberalism is one of the most influential lines of thinking of International Relations. This paper aims to provide a brief historical explanation, followed by the fundamental theories of complex interdependence and hegemonic stability. The case study of General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade represents an example of neoliberalist thoughts applied to the concrete international politics. My personal point of view fills just a little part of this paper (the conclusion), since I prefer to emphasize and grant relevance to the opinion of the main neoliberalist scholars.

    Read More

  • Differences And Similarities Of Liberalism

    1910 Words  | 4 Pages

    there is no established settled known law. As each man consults his own law of

    Read More

  • Globalization: Liberal Approach More Useful than Neo-realist

    1989 Words  | 4 Pages

    Neo-realist and liberal approaches towards globalisation have been debated about for many decades. Traditionally the liberal view towards globalisation has exaggerated the idea of globalisation, whilst neo-realist views have played down the importance of globalisation. The word “useful” can be defined on various different levels in order to come to a conclusion. Usefulness can be looked at as to how well each approach can help understand globalisation, however, usefulness can also be used to describe the impact of the different approaches and finally the word useful can be used to identify the accuracy of the two approaches, hopefully helping to recognise which approach to globalisation is most useful. This essay will first look at the differences between the neo-realist and liberal approaches to globalisation. These include; the extent to which globalisation exists in these approaches, the part that war has to play in the globalisation debate and finally where power lies which differs a lot between the two approaches, as Scholte describes, ‘realism oversimplistically reduces power relations’ (Scholte: 2005: p.128) which is in complete contrast to the liberal view of globalisation. This essay will then go on to look at the similarities existing between these two approaches which include the fact that these approaches are both Eurocentric and that they are not up to date with contemporary international politics. The usefulness of these approaches will be examined throughout in order to come to an analytical and evaluative conclusion, which gives a clear indication of the importance and extent of globalisation. Neo-realist and liberal views were coined by very different thinkers, who therefore have different views on globalisation...

    Read More

  • Realist and Liberalist Perspectives of Globalization

    741 Words  | 2 Pages

    Realist perspective explains globalization in terms of the relative distribution of power (Nau 2007, 278). In their opinion, trade and economic activities thrives “only under favorable security conditions,” and those conditions rely on the relative distribution of power (Nau 2007, 279). They believe that alliances and hegemony are the two most affirmative security conditions. “’Free trade is more likely within than across political-military alliances; and …alliances have had a much stronger effect on trade in a bipolar than in to a multipolar world.’” (Nau 2007, 279) In other words, the fewer dominating states with power there are in the system, the stronger is the alliance and its effect on trade. In a multipolar world, countries cannot trust each other in trade because alliances are rarely permanent and therefore, countries might use the gains from trade to increase its military power and threaten to cause damage to the other country. Thus, realists argue that,

    Read More

More about Difference Between Liberalism And Neoliberalism

Open Document