Difference Between Fordism And Post-Fordism

2141 Words5 Pages

Fordism and post-fordism Would you prefer to work in a Fordist or post-Fordist environment? Discuss the structural changes and transformations associated with the crisis of Fordism. “The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains.” said Karl Marx. Nonetheless, he would have been hard pressed to find a worker who agreed with this statement at the end of the Fordist period and even more so in the post-fordist one. Fordism is defined as a combination of: mass-production of a standardised product on an assembly line in order to maximise efficiency; increasing worker wages so that they can buy the product they are making; the philosophy of work management from World War I to the early 70s. Post-fordism is defined as: the rise of the service …show more content…

With increasing need for capital, it is less and less likely that someone owns their work; in fact it is likely that they never see the finished product, let alone produce it for themselves! When the work is ever more abstract and ever more fractioned between companies, as it is in a post-fordist society, the product is intangible (answering emails all day) or simply never seen (a piece of a piece of a microchip to go within other products for example), exponentially increasing alienation from product of labour. We are alienated from others when we work with people not by choice but by necessity and when the people in our lives are more distant. We are more and more specialised in smaller and smaller fields and it is an established fact that our bonds with society are growing more tenuous (Durkheim’s concept of anomie in The Division of Labour in Society; Weber’s fear that people become no more than cogs in rationalistic-legalistic society; …). Both have therefore led to increased alienation. Alienation from one’s identity is harder to explain or measure; we will leave it aside for …show more content…

This demand is actually what caused the shift from Fordism to Post-Fordism and the trait from which all others flow. Fordism has workers that can execute manual labour and buy the products they make; post-Fordism has educated workers that can create abstract labour and can buy a variety of products. Therefore, Post-Fordist companies don’t mass produce single standard products as Fordist ones did. Instead, they make many specialised but close products in order to switch from one product to another closely related product should the demand change; this responds to a consumer wants to pick and choose, change his mind or regularly change from close substitute to another and gives him this ability. This is far from (and far better than) Ford’s "Any customer can have a car painted any colour that he wants so long as it is black.". But there is another corollary: as noted above, in order to cope with this flexibility, the workers need to be educated and therefore even better paid than the Fordist workers. More pay is good in of itself, and solidifies the middle class as a bonus; this middle class is then in an even better position to demand more

Open Document