Diction In Religious Poetry

1964 Words4 Pages

Looking back at Anglo-Saxon literature, religious hymns are one of the few genres of poetry that are defined almost entirely by their rhetorical purpose. While sources such as the Oxford English Dictionary plainly define this poetic genre as “[songs] of praise to God,” the examination of several self-proclaimed hymns from the Anglo-Saxon era ultimately suggest a different definition altogether (“hymn, n.”). Though Cædmon’s Hymn and the “Hymn to St. Cuthbert” vary vastly in content, they ultimately fit the construct of the hymn that is outlined in the aforementioned definition—they consist of a set of lines that are sung en masse about the glory of a Christian God, functioning through concise structures optimized for recitation. If these two …show more content…

The possibility for this proliferation is enacted through the specific diction and the literary devices utilized throughout these texts. What separates the use of diction in religious hymns from other forms of poetry is that hymns necessitate the conscious portrayal of the text as something its audience can identify with. For example, both Cædmon’s Hymn and “Hymn to St. Cuthbert” actively use plural, personal pronouns throughout their texts in an attempt to draw a larger audience. Thus, when it is written that “we must praise the heaven-kingdom’s guardian,” a sense of responsibility is systematically being instilled among the text’s audience (Cædmon 1). The use of the plural, personal pronoun in these texts can also act as a fear tactic. In the “Hymn to St. Cuthbert,” the speaker writes that “we [must] beseech / [Cuthbert’s] perpetual aid, / so that we may deserve” eternal life at the hands of God (“Hymn to St. Cuthbert” 21-28). Though these lines seem innocuous, the use of the personal pronoun is an invitation of sorts, and, by denying it, the outsider privy to the hymn is essentially denying their chance for eternal life. The conscious use of the plural pronoun, then, is propagandistic at its core as its presence is meant to rope in any listeners who aren’t already taking part in the hymnody at hand. This method, while effective, is not utilized in Aldhelm’s Carmen rhythmicum. How, then, does Aldhelm participate in this active proliferation of knowledge? In short, he doesn’t. Not actively, anyway. Carmen rhythmicum, though portrayed as a hymn, consists of a narrative written in the first person. Interestingly enough, though, Aldhelm begins this narrative with the explanation that the speaker, “as a hymnist, sang this song / and delivered up [their] pledge / just as [they] once promised,”

Open Document