Desert Grasslands Saskia Beudel

1694 Words4 Pages

The landscape of a nation is fundamental to how a nation is identified. Australia had a distinctive landscape, a landscape that consisted of deserts, grasslands, huge rocks and native flora and fauna. The thing that distinguished Australia from other nations were the copious amount of harsh bushes. That is until white settlement occurred and Australia’s landscape was altered forever. The harsh bushes weren’t wiped out completely, but its strange beauty did not remain the same. Saskia Beudel and Kate Rigby discuss their experiences of Australia’s landscape and distinguish the discrepancies between what was and what occurred next in “Desert Grasslands” and “Returning to Rocky Nob: Stray thoughts on Canberra.”
Imagine returning to a land you were …show more content…

Her fascination with these lands is evident through her experiences of the road trip she embarked on around the desert. In her travelling, her attention was drawn to how vulnerable the desert plants were. She wanted to contemplate about the environmental and the cultural history of the land, and through her fascination of the grasses, she found that they tell one story “of that conjoined history”. The desert had a way of seducing her to its “austerity and spare lines, tempting interpretation as pure nature, too harsh and unruly to be harnessed to prosaic economic purposes, as if existing only as itself.” The desert was autonomous, it can only be interpreted in one way, as nature per se. Her focus was mostly on Mount Leislar, which was a small area that was engulfed by bloodwood trees and “beautiful grass”. Almost more than a century later, despite white colonisation, the “very beautiful grasses, continue to thrive”. Anthropologist T.G.H. Strehlow speaks for the older Aboriginal people who had condemned environmental change. He speaks of how their country has been transformed into a desert by “the senseless whites”. Many of their native species became extinct through the introduction of new species like the rabbits. …show more content…

The reader feels a sense of affinity and attachment to the land and to the Aborigines through the contrast of how the land was when it was under the care of the Aboriginal people, to how the land became when the foreigners entered and created a land of their own without entirely obliterating what was there initially. The Australian landscape was a harsh environment and still is, as was continually mentioned by both authors. The two parties who have claim over the land differently, view it as a source of income and national identity (for the white settlers) and as a source of life and nurture (for the Aboriginals). The stark nature of the land and its vast expanses that consist of rocky paths, open horizons from all areas, and bushlands with native flora and fauna left me with an affinity to the land that was. I felt like I was a part of the changing landscape with the metaphors and the personification that were used: “the growing suburbs of Canberra continue to consume even more remnants of this rural world”. Both texts gave me an idea of how landscape has created such literature within Australian Literary Studies. How? The words they used to describe the Australian landscape were literary and created many effects. The bushlands and their

More about Desert Grasslands Saskia Beudel

Open Document