Democratic Republic Of The Congo Essay

1222 Words3 Pages

In this essay I will contend that the state failure in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo hereafter) can best be explained by local level analysis. I will claim that identifying the governance structures left behind by the DR Congo’s colonial legacy explains why the local level of analysis is better suited for explaining the DR Congo’s continued fragility. I will discuss the failures and successes of both the local and national level of analyses in explaining the actions of Mobutu (ruled 1965-1997) and Joseph Kabila (2001- Current). The comparison of the effectiveness of these levels of analyses will support the idea that the local level of analysis is more effective at explaining the state’s failure. The DR Congo’s colonial legacy …show more content…

A lack of allegiance between the periphery and the central government created a huge opportunity for additional actors to make up the need being experienced by the rural population. Warlords, who offered public services, even if minimal, could now challenge the sovereignty of the central government. As Kaplan (2007, 300) cited in Bestwick (334) claims, there should be an emphasis on the DR Congo’s “political geography, limited governance capacities, dearth of infrastructure, and abundant mineral wealth.” The Congolese government fails to protect or support the majority of the people within its borders due to localized threats. The inability to quell these rebellions is illustrative of the need to look beyond the national level to fully understand the sources of DR Congo’s failure. The government’s weakness is leading different internal actors to fight over land ownership and possession of resources because there is no monopoly of violence. As Austessere argues, “local agendas are driving conflicts” (___). An example of this is the Congolese …show more content…

At times, this protection of personal power involves purposively going against the best interests of the populace and even the state as a whole. Joseph Kabila’s rule in the DR Congo serves as an excellent example. Kabila’s government both “hamstring[s] its own security apparatus and [fuels] armed groups in the country’s eastern region” (9). From a national level of analysis this would not seem like the actions of a rational actor. Conversely, the local level of analysis shows that Kabila is undermining his government in order to set up patronage networks to protect himself by minimizing the possibility of an influential official that has been hired based on skill. Similar logic applies to the arming of armed

Open Document