Definition Of Social Identity

2099 Words5 Pages

To begin with, it is at first necessary to understand the meaning of social identity in the context of this paper. Social identity of a person is his identity or his essence in the society. It depends on how his personality is perceived by the society and what he thinks about his own self. External factors affect the identity of a person to a very great extent. It may cause changes that may be positive or negative. It is immensely important to note that social identity of a group or a person is not created in isolation. In this paper we are concerned with the social identity of people as a community.
Social identity crisis arises when certain factors start affecting the identity of a community in a negative manner to an extent that even survival …show more content…

Efforts were at zenith to form a unified India. Indian leaders wanted all the princely states to cede to India. At this juncture, we can trace the origins of Telangana crisis. The Nizam of Hyderabad had refused to join the territory of India and had decided to remain an independent state, taking advantage of the treaty of annexation. However, as this posed a threat to the unity and integrity of our nation, through political expertise Nizam was made to surrender however was allowed to be the Raj Pramukh . Hyderabad consisted of three linguistic regions, Marathi, Kannada, and Telugu. Telangana was this Telugu speaking region of Hyderabad. In the past, when British ruled India, Nizam ruled the region which we today know as Telangana while the other parts were under the British. Other areas flourished and developed under the British while the Telangana region under Nizam remained barbaric and underdeveloped. This is the sad history of discrimination, perpetual poverty, illiteracy and exploitation by landlords through the feudal system, despite being a region rich in …show more content…

It was a movement to unite all the Telugu speaking states. Now by that logic Telangana should also be a part of it. However, this is where the protest began. Andhra leaders supported the merging of Telangana with them because of their own selfish motives. Telangana was rich in resources and by including Telangana there would be no need to share the existing resources. However, it posed a threat to the identity of people in Telangana. As the States Re-organisation Committee said while opposing this merger, “seems to be the apprehension felt by the educationally backward people of Telangana that they may be swamped and exploited by the more advanced people of coastal areas.” Finally, in 1952 the movement succeeded and Telangana became a part of Andhra

Open Document