Consider the meaning of “fair”. What impact does fairness--perceived or actual--have in society and your life? Has fairness ever helped or hurt you personally? At what cost or benefit to you or others? (Washington and Lee University) There is a magical moment in every person’s first job: the moment when you get your first paycheck. Imagine this: you’ve been coming to work after school and slaving away for a couple of hours. This money is hard earned. The idea of fast food grosses you out, but, still, you have become the chain restaurant’s best employee. You’re nearly bouncing with anticipation as you look at the payroll. Your net pay is $100. Now, imagine this: your younger sibling makes $5 a week by doing chores. They complain that this is unfair that you get so much more than them. So your dad gives them $95 just to get them to stop whining. In your sibling’s eyes this is fair. In your eyes this is very unfair. …show more content…
It is a term that is also often misunderstood. Fairness really depends on point of view. I have always thought of fairness more in terms of equal opportunity instead of equal outcome. This would mean that in a fair society that everyone has the chance to earn $100. It is up to each individual to work hard enough to earn the $100. Equal opportunity doesn’t always happen though. People in America many more chances to earn money than people in the middle of the Amazon forest. People without disabilities are more likely to be hired than people without
Throughout the world, discrimination in all forms has continued to be a constant struggle; whether it’s racial, gender based, religion, beliefs, appearance or anything that makes one person different from another, it’s an everyday occurrence. A major place that discrimination is occurring at is in the workplace. One of the largest problems discrimination issues is believed to be gender. Women, who have the same amount of experience as men are not getting paid at the same rate as men, these women also are equally trained and educated. According to the article Gender Pay, it was discovered in 2007 that a woman makes 81 cents for every dollar a man earns.(“Gender Pay”) . This shouldn’t be happening in today’s society for the fact the society lived in today is suppose to be more accepting. Men are viewed as being more popular, valuable and having higher powers than women. The Reason Discrimination is involved in the equal pay equal work is because of the significance it has to how some businesses pay their employees.
What is fairness? Fairness in law is decisions which will be made on the basis of a set of established rules that are known (Banks, 2007). For example, if there were no laws about using mobile phone while you are driving, it would be unfair for a person ...
The first standard of equality is ontological equality which is the notion that everyone is created equal at birth. Ontological equality often justifies material inequality. In fact, this type of equality is sometimes used to put forth the notion that poverty is a virtue. A second standard of equality is equality of opportunity meaning that “everyone has an equal chance to achieve wealth, social prestige, and power because the rules of the game, so to speak, are the same for everyone”( Conley, 247). Therefore, any existing inequality is fair as long as everyone plays by the rules. The standard of equality is equality of condition, which is the idea that everyone should have an equal starting point. The last form of equality is equality of outcome which states, everyone should end up with the same outcome regardless of
they are really unequal which isn’t what the U.S. was built upon. Social injustice is a big part
In correlating the scores from the Self-Assessment Exercise located on pages 58-59 of our text book I have discovered that the fairness for which I score my place of work, and the organization for which I work, the highest is in fact Interpersonal Justice; for which my combines score totaled 13 out of a possible 15. This places Interpersonal justice at a very high overall level of perceived justice for me. And I can think of many reason ranging from the broad to the personal, and from the historic to the current, which all could be contributors to my having this perception.
Nowadays, most women remain unaware that their employers underpay them. Women cannot argue for higher wages if they do not know they earn less than their male equivalents. Each employee sharing their salary will allow women to detect if they are earning less than their male colleagues with little difficulty. This will give women the tools needed to argue for a higher pay rate, and will help lower the wage gap. If a female worker goes to her boss with statistical evidence that she earns less than her male associates, the chances that her boss will award her a higher salary significantly increase. The law will make it almost impossible for companies to pay their male workers more than their female workers (Glynn para. 7). Furthermore, a law requiring employees to share their salaries will bring to light other forms of wage discrimination. The wage gap not only represents gender discrimination in the workplace, it also reflects the ongoing issue of racial discrimination. While white women do typically earn less than white men, they out earn the majority of female colored workers in America. The average African American female makes only 64 cents for the white man’s dollar. Additionally, Hispanic women receive only 54 cents to their white male coworker’s dollar (Hegewisch para. 9). If women of color become aware of how little they earn compared to
Wage inequalities are not a result of women’s qualifications or choices. Wage discrimination persists despite women’s increased educational attainment, greater level of experience in workforce, and decreased amount of time spent out of the workforce raising children.
Under American law everyone is considered equal, the term equal refers to the many different ways people are treated the same in American society; even if they are not truly equal with each other. Everyone ranges from being poor to rich; they also range in
...he justice system is not always successful. Although the idea of fairness is present, how it plays out can vary. Justice is only a moral based idea. People are bound by their own values, not a universal set of values.
Equal opportunity, it's such a standard policy these days. It was originally associated with the feminist movement with the simple intent to establish a level playing field. The 'prima facia' of the phrase is idealistic, and at the least, the perpetual continuation of egalitarianism. Although these are both true, taking a look deeper into the contemporary application of the concept reveals anything but equality.
To this end, there is dire need to reform the justice system to curb the preference of discrimination as well as disparity (Mathis, 2007). The two would lead to great injustices as the victims of both would end up meeting justice in an unfair manner.
An example of equality not being fair can be shown where two students are taking the same class. One student is normal in abilities and the other has a learning disability. The second student suffers from dyslexia. The students in the class are expected to listen to the teacher and to take notes. The normal student would be able to read and write efficiently. However, the dyslexic student would have a hard time not only reading the board presentations but in taking notes. This would cause the dyslexic student to not be able to learn as much as the normal student.
According to Aristotle, distributive justice incorporates the allocation of resources amongst society(Aristotle, trans W.d Ross, 1994). These resources can include education, profession, honor, status, money, or property (Pollsky, 2012, p. 54). There are a variety of theories that describe various methods of carrying out distributive justice including ideas of need, merit, and entitlement. These ideas work in order to bring the goal of justice which is equality and fairness within society. However, the reason that this is not the most important form of justice is that it is too narrow in scope.
Equality exists in many contexts. It can exist in the political level; individuals have the same rights under the law. It can exist in a social level, between categories of people, for example gender, or race. It can even exist on an individual level, as to how each person is treated. Equality cannot be confined to simply equal opportunities for all; for an equal and fair process is still equality. An equal and fair result is also equality. At each of the different level, equality shifts from being realistic or being desirable, sometimes both, or sometimes neither.