Defending Walt Whitman Analysis

1132 Words3 Pages

Poetry is a universe of subjectivity. When two poems are set up, side-by-side, to create discussion, results may vary. But it is clear in Sherman Alexie’s two poems, “Defending Walt Whitman” and “How to Write the Great American Indian Novel”, where the discussion must go. Alexie explores Native American culture and the effect that the Europeans have had on the native people of the United States. This feat is accomplished through the thoughtful use of several literary devices, including tone, simile, allusion, and metaphor.
Tradition is an important building block in the history of any people. This statement is especially apparent for the Native Americans, and is something that Alexie exploits in his poetry to intertwine a deeper meaning into his work. In “Defending Walt Whitman”, Alexie uses …show more content…

But the most obvious effects are seen in How to Write the Great American Indian Novel. Alexie spend a great deal of time antagonizing what makes an ‘indian’. He cites birth, if you love one, if you smell like one, if you “ carry an Indian deep inside themselves” (line 28), or if it is your interior. Alexie makes the point to use the term ‘half-breed’, which begs the question of what qualifies an American Indian? As previously mentioned, Alexie employs a bitter tone through this poem, and in part can be credited to the cynicism and anger Alexie feels to the white culture seeping through the cracks and oppressing the Native American people. The statement could be made that white people claim the heritage of the Native American as their own. They stomp through the U.S. taking land, culture, and tradition. The sealing factor of this idea is seen in the last lines, “In the Great American Indian novel, when it is finally written, all of the white people will be Indians and all of the Indians will be ghosts” (lines

Open Document