Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impacts of British rule in India
An essay on religions in india
An essay on religions in india
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impacts of British rule in India
The Sepoy Rebellion was the repercussion due to the provocation of the Indian Sepoys by the British Forces. In particular, the incident that had outraged the Sepoys were the animal-fat grease on the cartridges. Pigs and cows as meals were strictly restricted in Islam and Hinduism, as the Sepoys were unwilling to sacrifice their faithfulness towards religion. At that, the British overpowered the administration in Oudh, a region lavished with Indian history and heritage, in which triggered many issues. The Sepoy Army was generally composed of Hindus and Muslims who were dominated by the British. The Sepoys had yearned for freedom from the British, yet they had the inability to do so only because the British held technologically advanced weapons. When the British generated a new gun, the cartridges needed to be coated in animal fat grease, more specifically, fat from pigs and cows. The Indian Sepoys failed to accept these now gunpowder cartridges, as they acknowledged that these were manufactured with cow and pig fat grease. In Document A: Gardiner’s English History, it is written by Samuel Rawson Gardiner that “It happened that an improved rifle had lately been invented for the use of the soldiers, and …show more content…
The religiously devoted Sepoys decided to stay loyal towards their religion, and starting getting furious at the fact that they were enforced to work in such a condition in which workers were obliged to break a religious law. Though, this incident was just the establishment of the Sepoy Rebellion. As the British saw that the Sepoys refused to work due to the cartridges, they attempted a hasty endeavor to change over sepoys to Christianity, which backfired as well. This situation in particular triggered most of the Sepoy Army, as it tested the Army’s loyalty towards their religion. They had remained to stay upright towards their religion, and together they decided to start fighting back the
The unpredictable failure of the Articles of Confederation to the continental congress was a huge problem. The Articles of Confederation was made so the states would have more power, And limit the powers of the national government. Main contributors for this action was the fear that the national government will gain too much power and overstep its authority.This would have a negative effect on the nation, because tensions will start to rise for the ineffectiveness of this new system of government. A Rebellion best known as Shays rebellion, took place shortly after The adoption of the Articles of Confederation. The states, in which shays rebellion has taken place, were becoming unjust/unfair the way in which the state collected taxes. Since the Articles of Confederation was a complete failure
From the time period 1775-1800, the American Revolution would impact the United States in political, social and economic ways.
Much like chapter two, chapter four provides an overview of the East India Company's Bengali sepoy regiments. Chapter five addresses the major causes of the Sepoy Rebellion, and summarizes its events and participants. Chapter six provides a short historiographical review of three Indian texts on the Sepoy Rebellion, exposing the reader to Indian interpretations of the events. Finally, part three consists of chapter seven, which is a comparison of the major similarities and differences of Batavian Revolt and Sepoy Rebellion, and serves to highlight key aspects of both.
The peasant’ revolt in the German states during 1524-1526 consisted of peasants, unwealthy soldiers, and craftsmen. These rebels authored Articles and met in Memmingen, Swabia, during 1525, which was known as the Peasant Parliament. Many rebels and others were killed in several battles that ultimately led to the revolts being terminated by authorities. The causes of the peasants’ revolt included lack of compensation for services, feelings of spiritual inequality, lords refusing peasant freedom without reimbursement, and the peasants’ manipulation of Lutheran principles; while the responses to the revolt incorporated negativity, violence, and authority intervention.
...riculture was seen as ludicrous. Livestock has never been a part of the Native American tradition so why should they change it for the English? Eventually the lawmakers of this colony developed laws that regulated killing and domesticating livestock. Essentially, holding true to belief and tradition under the law of the English led to King Philip’s War between the Native Americans and English.
In King Phillip’s Herds: Indians, Colonists, and the Problem of Livestock in Early New England, Virginia DeJohn Anderson described livestock in early New England, brought over by European colonists and used in the unsuccessful attempt to assimilate the Native Americans, led by King Phillip, into English ways. King Phillip’s bad relations with Indians, stemming from livestock, caused him a title transition from livestock keeper to war leader. The use of livestock by the Native Americans was ineffective to their way of life due to their previous hunting practices, gender roles in society, their spiritual beliefs and practices and land boundaries; causing growing tensions between Native Americans and European settlers during the 1600’s, arguably
The Border Ruffians were soldiers that supported keeping slavery and they were from the state of Missouri. Ruffian means a violent person involved in crime. In 1854-1860, they crossed over into the Kansas Territory to rush the acceptance of slavery there before it would become a state. Therefore, the slavery abolitionists from Kansas did not like this push.
In the year 1604 the Cajuns at this time known as the Acadians were forced to flee from their homes. The Cajuns are French descents. France was the first owners of the first permit colonies in North America. In 1713 the British won rights over the French and took away their colonies. The Cajuns (Acadians) denied obeying the rules of the British which required renouncing their Catholic religion. The Cajuns were forced to evacuate from their homes. This dreadful incident is better known as the “Le Grand Derangemen...
A lot of people say that the southern part of the united states is what started the war. Their stubborn ways force the north to take action which lead to the civil war. In all reality there was more that came into play when the civil war was in the making. States rights was one of the problem that lead to the civil war, the constitution did not define who had what powers and what authority over one what. Also slavery played a part because the slaves were raising up and fighting for their rights in which the south did not like and and the north tried to help only making the problem worse. The differences between the free states and the slave states was the power of the national government to prohibit slavery in the territories that had not yet
In 1789, the French people began to stand up to their current monarchical government in order to obtain rights and laws that they felt they deserved. The Reign of Terror followed after the Revolution and seemed to stand for the complete opposite of what the people had previously stood up for. The Reign of Terror began in 1793 and ended in 1794 due to the decapitation of Maximilien Robespierre. The Reign of Terror can be explained as a time period in France when many counter revolutionaries were killed because of their traditional beliefs. Counter revolutionaries believed in preserving the ways of the monarchy, but since the majority of people thought otherwise, these opposing beliefs led to death. The French government did not have good reason to conduct such drastic measures against those who challenged the Revolution.
Liberty, equality, and freedom are all essential parts to avoiding anarchy and maintaining tranquility even through the most treacherous of times. The Reign of Terror is well known as the eighteen month long French Revolution (1793-1794). In this period of time, a chief executive Maximilien Robespierre and a new French government executed gigantic numbers of people they thought to be enemies of the revolution; inside and outside of the country. The question is; were these acts of the new French government justified? Not only are the acts that occurred in the Reign of Terror not justified, they were barbaric and inhumane.
Such case is true, for our textbook, and document 1. Both clearly state the rebellion was triggered off of the cartridges used to seal the new rifles. The full story that is written in these documents is that the rebellion was caused because the British started bringing over a new and improved rifle for the Sepoys. This may have been a good thing if amplification of rumors. A rumor that the sealant for the new rifles were made of cow and pig fat became popular. Since most of the Sepoys were either Hindu or Muslim, this offended their religion. The Hindu's sacred animal was the cow, and the Muslims did not eat pork. Because of this, both of these religious groups found these rumors to be extremely offensive, and are said to have revolted because of this. This issue with the cartridge may have had a small impact on the start of the rebellion, but it is hard to believe that this was the sole situation that caused the entire
On May 10th of 1857, Elphinstone was proven right when the Sepoy's rebelled against the British starting the Sepoy Rebellion. Prior to this rebellion, there had been other Sepoy led outbreaks. The difference being was that all of these were quickly and brutally ended by the British. The final “spark”, as Maria Elde...
As a direct result of the Sepoy Mutiny, the Indian presence in the British army was reduced to almost a half of what it had been. Also whereas before Indian regiments had been allowed to exist separately, they were now incorporated to be part of larger British regiments. High caste Hindus and Brahmins were stereotyped as dishonest, because of their role as provokers and their nationalist sympathies. The opposite can be said of such groups as the Sikhs, who were portrayed as model citizens and soldiers.
"All the leadership had spent their early years in England. They were influenced by British thought, British ideas, that is why our leaders were always telling the British "How can you do these things? They're against your own basic values.". We had no hatred, in fact it was the other way round - it was their values that made us revolt." -Aruna Asaf Ali, a leader of the Indian National Congress. (Masani, quoted in Wood, 32, 1989)