Dbq Essay On Tyranny

521 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Side by side differences between the constitution and articles of confederation

“The accumulation of all powers... in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” According to James Madison, Tyranny shouldn’t only be able to define just a singular person but can also define a group of people with an overwhelming amount of power. In order to protect the rights of the citizens the constitution was framed in such a way that makes it extremely difficult for a person or group of people to seize complete control over the government since the powers are divided between the states and the federal government, and divided again within each category in order to disperse the powers in order to better prevent tyranny. The first distinct division that the constitution frames is a separation of state and federal powers. The division of state and federal powers create a uniting power in order to control the state governments from an uprising and prevent the federal government from completely controlling the state powers. In …show more content…

In order to prevent the development of tyranny “liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct” (Doc B). James Madison in Federalist Paper #47 stated that the three branches, executive, judicial, and legislative, were necessary in order to prevent the collection of power. In Articles 1, 2, and 3 of the Constitution of the United States of America, it essentially details the division of powers to Congress, the President of the United States, and Supreme and inferior courts (Doc B). These articles detail restrictions that are given to each branch such as the term restriction for the president, the division of Congress between the House of Representatives and the Senate, and the holding of office in the judicial branch only under good behavior. The articles give a synopsis of what each branch is entitled

Show More
Related

  • Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Essay

    531 Words  | 2 Pages

    You may be thinking how did the constitution stop tyranny? Well we have the answer. Let's start of with what tyranny means, that a leader or king abuses their power. How did the constitution guard against tyranny? Well they abuse their power bad deeds. The constitution guard against tyranny in these four ways. Federalism, separation of power, checks and balances, and small states vs. large states.

    Read More

  • Separation Of Powers Dbq Essay Power

    556 Words  | 2 Pages

    To start out with, the constitution divided power so no one branch or person had complete power over the nation or others. In document B it states, ¨Liberty requires that the three departments of power are distinct and separate.¨ This means that in order to prevent and guard against tyranny we must have different and separate branches holding power if there is only one or they are too similar that could create a small group with close to complete power creating a tyranny. Power must be separated into three branches so that they may check and limit each other so that no laws are passed that will harm the nation and are unconstitutional. The three branches are very separate but can

    Read More

  • How the Constitution Guards Against Tyranny

    642 Words  | 2 Pages

    The separation of powers keeps any one branch from gaining too much power by creating 3 separate, distinct branches power can be shared equally among. According to Madison, “Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct.”(Document B) In other words, to avoid tyranny and achieve liberty, the three branches of government (executive, legislative, and judicial) must be separate and diverse. The purpose of a separation of powers is to divide the powers of the government so there is not only one central source of power. The three branches must be as distinct as possible to avoid falling into the hands of one individual leader. There are also checks and balances between these three branches. Checks and balances are a system of each branch monitoring an...

    Read More

  • Dbq How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny

    449 Words  | 1 Pages

    The third guard against tyranny was checks and balances which means that each branch can check on each other.It says in Madison's quote in Document C that the several offices were arranged so that they can be a check on the other. Document C shows that the branches are separated by congress, president, and the courts, which are the three main parts of the constitution.Checks and balances protects against tyranny by giving the branches the power to check on other branches.

    Read More

  • Tyranny Dbq Essay

    705 Words  | 2 Pages

    The constitution guarded against tyranny using federalism. [Federalism is the system where the states and central government share power.] [Document A was written by James

    Read More

  • The New Science of Politics

    813 Words  | 2 Pages

    "This inquiry will naturally divide itself into three branches- the objects to be provided for by a federal government, the quantity of power necessary to the accomplishment of those objects, the persons whom that power ought to operate," writes Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist #23 in reference to the separation of powers. The basic concept here is the idea of the federal government being divided into three separate branches that would balance excessive democracy through a system of checks on each other. The three branches, respectively known as the legislature (Article I), the executive (Article II), and the judiciary (Article III), were designed to entice the opponents of the Co...

    Read More

  • Power of the Branches

    1126 Words  | 3 Pages

    Our Constitution establishes three branches of government and defines their very existence. The reason for the three branches is to separate the powers. The phrase “separation of powers” isn’t in the constitution, but it best explains the intention of the Constitution. It is essential that the assignment of lawmaking, enforcing and interpreting be spread out among the separated powers to ensure that all power doesn’t fall into the lap of one group, or even a power-hungry individual. The powers of which I’m speaking that were intentionally separated by way of the Constitution are the Legislative Branch, Executive Branch and finally, the Judicial Branch.

    Read More

  • The Key to the Protection Against Tyranny in the American Constitution

    1402 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the Constitution, central and state governments received power that was shared and split in a federalist system, preventing tyranny of one over the other. Madison put forward his idea of federalism in Federalist Paper #51. “...the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments...The different governments will each control each other, at the same time each will be controlled by itself” (Doc. A). A Venn diagram derived from the Constitution shows that the central government controlled national affairs such as war, foreign trade, and foreign relations, and states controlled internal affairs such as establishing public services and regulating in-state businesses. The shared powers included taxes, loans, and laws. Despite Madison’s bias towards the federalist system (rarely does one truly attack one’s own political treatise within it) in his quote, the apportioning of powers shows that neither the central or st...

    Read More

  • The US Constitution

    1697 Words  | 4 Pages

    The founding fathers of the American Constitution divided the government up into the following three branches to prevent the majority from ruling with an iron fist; legislative, judicial, and executive. The three braches were created by the Constitution: Article 1, Legislative branch made up of the House and the Senate, collectively known as Congress; Article 2, Executive branch, or President; Article 3, Judicial branch, made up of the federal courts and the Supreme Court. This was done in efforts to distribute power amongst the three so that one would not have more power than the other. Each branch has the ability to check the power of the other branches. This power check of the other branches is referred to as the checks and balances, better known as the Separation of Powers. This was to prevent tyriny.

    Read More

  • The Difference Between Separation of Powers and Federalism

    308 Words  | 1 Pages

    Separation of powers is the separation of branches under the constitution by the legislative, judicial, and executive branches of government. Federalism is a government system that includes the national government, which shares sovereign powers with fifty state governments.

    Read More

  • Democracy In The 19th Century

    1358 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the construction of the new Constitution, many of the most prominent and experienced political members of America’s society provided a framework on the future of the new country; they had in mind, because of the failures of the Articles of Confederation, a new kind of government where the national or Federal government would be the sovereign power, not the states. Because of the increased power of the national government over the individual states, many Americans feared it would hinder their ability to exercise their individual freedoms. Assuring the people, both Alexander Hamilton and James Madison insisted the new government under the constitution was “an expression of freedom, not its enemy,” declaring “the Constitution made political tyranny almost impossible.” (Foner, pg. 227) The checks and balances introduced under the new and more powerful national government would not allow the tyranny caused by a king under the Parliament system in Britain. They insisted that in order achieve a greater amount of freedom, a national government was needed to avoid the civil unrest during the system under the Articles of Confederation. Claiming that the new national government would be a “perfect balance between liberty and power,” it would avoid the disruption that liberty [civil unrest] and power [king’s abuse of power in England] caused. The “lackluster leadership” of the critics of the new constitution claimed that a large land area such as America could not work for such a diverse nation.

    Read More

  • Constitutional Republic

    800 Words  | 2 Pages

    Between 1787 and 1791 the Framers of the US Constitution established a system of government upon principles that had been discussed and partially implemented in many countries over the course of several centuries, but never before in such a pure and complete design, which we call a constitutional republic. Since then, the design has often been imitated, but important principles have often been ignored in those imitations, with the result that their governments fall short of being true republics or truly constitutional. The Framers of the Constitution tried very hard to design a system that would not allow any one person or group within the government to gain too much power. Personally, I think they succeeded. In order to guard against what one of the Founding Fathers called an "excess of democracy," the Constitution was built with many ways to limit the government's power. Among these methods were separating the three branches, splitting the legislature so laws are carefully considered, and requiring members of Congress to meet certain criteria to qualify for office. The Founders did leave a few problems along with their system.

    Read More

  • Preventing Tyranny: The Power of the Constitution

    1370 Words  | 3 Pages

    As James Madison said, “The different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” What James Madison is trying to say is that the central and state governments have enough power that they don’t control everything. The central government has enough power to help some of the country’s major needs, and the state government has enough power to help the state’s needs because the state’s needs may be more specific. From this, you may conclude, that dividing powers between the central and state governments prevents tyranny. The first guard against tyranny was Federalism, which means a system of government in which power is divided between a federal government and state government.

    Read More

  • Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Dbq Analysis

    548 Words  | 2 Pages

    One way that the constitution can guard against tyranny is with Federalism. Federalism is the distribution of powers between the state and the federal government. This prevents both the state and the federal government from having too much power. For example, in Doc A, it says that only states can set up schools, but only the federal government can set up post offices. This makes it

    Read More

  • The Absolute Monarchy Of France In The 17th Century

    731 Words  | 2 Pages

    An Analysis of the Absolute Monarchy of France in the 17th Century This historical study will define the absolute monarchy as it was defied through the French government in the 17th century. The term ‘absolute” is defined I the monarchy through the absolute control over the people through the king and the royal family. All matters of civic, financial, and political governance was controlled through the king’s sole power as the monarchical ruler of the French people. In France, Louis XIII is an important example of the absolute monarchy, which controlled all facts of military and economic power through a single ruler. Udder Louis XIII’s reign, the consolidation of power away from the Edicts of Nantes to dominant local politics and sovereignty

    Read More

More about Dbq Essay On Tyranny

Open Document