We have often heard that humans are the superior beings; usually we take that saying at face value and agree with it because we are process thinkers and are capable of being multilingual. But a more in depth look or thought process of that saying reveals many differences many of us would not think of at first. Human beings are superior because of several unique factors. One is we have this idea that our lives have a meaning and we are so worried about what we make of our lives and ensure that we are happy and obtain our goals and desires; whereas animals on the other hand just worry about finding food and staying alive. Another unique aspect is that we are extremely self-centered, we are always focused on our own goals and we think the world …show more content…
For this area, we shall use David Wallace’s commencement address, where he gives the examples of “food shopping and being stuck in traffic” (Wallace). We learn for this address that we tend to have this conception that we are the center of the world, and everyone is revolving around us. Thanks to this concept we tend to get annoyed when people or things get in our way like traffic, or other people in line at the grocery store. However, Wallace pointed out a good point, what if we started to realize that “we are not the center of the world and that rather we might be in the way of someone else” (Wallace). Then we tend to start not getting so easily angry and things that originally annoyed us are now, not as bothersome as before. Plus, we also might start to be polite to people, maybe if we see an elderly person waiting in line, we would let them go before us, or even help them put their bags in their car. We might also start caring about other people, give the homeless person on the corner of the city block a bottle of water and maybe something to eat. If we weren’t so selfish would we have world hunger? Its estimated that the richest people in the world could easily end world hunger… yet why don’t
In the “George Bush’ Columbia” speech, George W. Bush used a variety of ways in order to make his mark and effectively assemble his dialog. One of the most prominent strategies Mr. Bush used was his sentence structure. He did a great job shaping his speech by initially addressing the problem at hand. He first stated what happened, who it happened to, and gave his condolences to the ones who didn’t make it, along with their families. Mr. Bush also seemed sincere throughout his speech as he made sure to mention each hero apart of the crew. Another technique George W. Bush displayed was the diction and tone he used while delivering the speech. From listening to the audio last week, I remember the passion behind Bush’s words and the sincerity
43rd President of the United States, George Bush, in his speech, “9/11 Address to the Nation” addresses the nation about the day of September 11, 2001. Bush’s purpose is to convey the events of September 11, 2001 and what was and will be done about them. He adopts a serious yet somber tone in order to appeal to the strong and emotional side of the public and to his listeners around the world.
It all happened in an instant. One minute thousands of civilians were on their way to work when everything changed. President George Bush gave an iconic speech that was not only memorable but gave hope to the Americans that justice would be served to those associated with the terrorist group al-Qaida. George Bush’s speech rallied the Americans to fight back against the terrorists because he used rhetorical devices such as parallelism, analogies, and repetition.
Martin Luther King Jr. and George Wallace both had opposing viewpoints on the civil rights movement. In 1963, George Wallace wrote the Inaugural Address and Martin Luther king Jr. wrote the “I have a dream” speech. In George Wallace’s speech, George had a calm tone
“This is Water” is a commencement speech written for students about to graduate with a Liberal Arts Degree from a prestigious school and seems to be geared more directly to those questioning the validity of their degree. David Foster Wallace explains that the education they received allows the audience to handle the monotony and frustrations of the world better by stepping back and realizing that the individual in the audience are not the center of universe. David’s diverse diction gives this work a strong educated but down to earth feel using the words from “didactic” to “bullshitty”.
George W. Bush’s “9/11 Address to the Nation” is a speech in which he talks about the catastrophic event on September eleventh, 2001. Two airplanes crash into the Twin Towers in New York City on this day, shocking the entire world. He addresses this speech to the people of America on the night of the disastrous event, to let the people of the United States know what is going on. This speech explains how the United States is a strong country, the motives behind the event, as well as to bring the United States together and stronger.
In his essay, “Deciderization; 2007,” David Foster Wallace Argues: Part of our emergency is that it’s so tempting to do this sort of thing now, to retreat to narrow arrogance, pre-formed positions, rigid filter, the ‘moral clarity’ of the immature. The alternative is dealing with massive, high- entropy amounts of info and ambiguity and conflict and flux; its continually discovering new areas of personal ignorance and delusion. In sum, to really try to be informed and literate today is to feel stupid nearly all the time, and to need help. That’s about as clear as I can put it. What Wallace is trying to say that the people of today’s world are either Objective or subjective and nothing in between; therefore, the objective type of people are all
The commencement speech given by David Foster Wallace in the autumn of 2005, is a very deep speech that examines the whole idea of a Liberal Arts education at an extremely deep and intellectual level. In the 22 minute long speech Wallace talks about how higher education not only teaches you to think but “how to exercise some control over how and what you think.” (Wallace). Wallace later in his speech stresses the importance of this level of thinking by saying “if you cannot exercise this kind of choice in adult life, you will be totally hosed” (Wallace) What he means by saying this is that if you cannot think at a higher level and make sense of real world problems your life will become meaningless and you will become dead inside your head.
“Climb on one’s back and stand on their shoulders to reach the top” this is what the Coronel Colin Powell hints to recent graduate from the Howard University in 1994. The Commencement Speech was long enough to motivate the graduating students. Also, it was proper and formal. When the speech began, Powell was exciting by ending on sharing his own experiences and giving great advices for those future professionals. Powell´s Commencement Speech demonstrates his interest by sharing his thoughts, and its language was uplifting and captivating. (502).
Of the many truly inspirational speeches given by African Americans, Booker T. Washington’s The Atlanta Exposition Address is one of the few that intends to achieve compromise. In his speech, Washington is trying to persuade an audience composed significantly of white men to support African Americans by granting them jobs and presenting them with opportunities. His goal is to convince his white audience that African Americans will be supplied with jobs lower than those of white men, allowing white men always to be on top. Booker T. Washington’s The Atlanta Exposition Address adopts a tone of acquiescence and compromise to persuade a predominantly white audience to accept his terms.
In this paper I am going to discuss the rhetorical appeals, as well as the argumentative structure, audience and purpose set forth by George W. Bush in his September 27 speech in Flagstaff, Arizona. More specifically I will refer to the rhetorical appeals of ethos, pathos and logos, and explain how they are used to gain the support and attention of the audience and further the further the purpose of the speech. As I explain these appeals I will also give an insight into the argumentative structure and why it is apparent in this particular speech.
Martin Luther King Jr is one of the wisest and bravest black man the world has ever seen. He has set the path way for the black community and other miniorities. In his Nobel Prize Speech the “Quest for Peace and Justice”, King had three major points that he addressed in the “Quest of Peace and Justice”. One of the points he made was about racial injustice and how we need to eliminate it. King stated that, “when civilization shifts its basic outlooks then we will have a freedom explosion”. Overtime things must change, nothing never stays the same. King’s way of making parallels with this is making the claim is saying, “Oppressed people can’t oppressed forever, and the yearning will eventually manifest itself”. He insisted that blacks have,
Humans are extremely complex and unique beings. We are animals however we often forget our origins and our place in the natural world and consider ourselves superior to nature. Humans are animals but what does it mean to be human? What are the defining characteristics that separate us from other animals? How are we different? Human origins begin with primates, however through evolution we developed unique characteristics such as larger brain sizes, the capacity for language, emotional complexity and habitual bipedalism which separated us from other animals and allowed us to further advance ourselves and survive in the natural world. Additionally, humans have been able to develop a culture, self-awareness, symbolic behavior, and emotional complexity. Human biological adaptations separated humans from our ancestors and facilitated learned behavior and cultural adaptations which widened that gap and truly made humans unlike any other animal.
This view, that humans are of special moral status, is constantly attempted to be rationalized in various ways. One such defense is that we are not morally wrong to prioritize our needs before the needs of nonhuman animals for “the members of any species may legitimately give their fellows more weight than they give members of other species (or at least more weight than a neutral view would grant them). Lions, too, if they were moral agents, could not then be criticized for putting other lions first” (Nozick, 79). This argument, that we naturally prefer our own kind, is based on the same fallacy used by racists while defending their intolerant beliefs and therefore should be shown to have no logical merit.
In his commencement sppech, David Forester Walla writes many useful things that we face in our everyday life. What is life? How you will leave it? It is YOUR choice. For many people, life is a routine: YOU wake up, take a shower, put your expensive perfume, get in your “Audi A5”, turn on “50 Cent”. Then YOU stuck in traffic - those 30 minutes seem 2 hours for YOU and YOU get annoyed, then angry. At work you do everything perfectly, but your boss does not appreciate it. You think that it is because of your race, expensive cloth or that this boss is just jealous. Wait, do not take anything personally. You, as a person, have to make an agreement with yourself whether to be free or to always think that everybody is against you in this world. Isn’t it complicated? Whatever happens around you, do not take it personally. The simplest example would be when you hear your boss saying: “You are such a bad worker! Go away and eat your lunch!”. Without knowing it you would think it’s about you. As David Foster Wallace said: “…I am the absolute censer of the universe; the realest, most vivid and important person in existence…”. It is not always about YOU, it’s about ME as well. YOU take too much things personally which make your head busy with “waste”. As soon as you agree, that the thing that was said is true, the poison goes through, and you are trapped is what we call personal importance. Personal importance, or taking things personally, is the maximum expression od selfishness because we make the assumption that everything is about “ME”. During the period of our education, work, childhood, domestication - we learn to make everything personally. We thing we are responsible for everything: me me me me. It is always ME. Nothing other people d...