Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Feminist criticism an essay
Feminist Criticism
Feminist criticism an essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Feminist criticism an essay
What is something that is given value that runs the world? Money. It is something that many people strive for in which it corrupts them or allows them to take unethical measures for it. This is observed in Friedrich Dürrenmatt’s, The Visit. Dürrenmatt wrote his play during a time where immorality showed the most: after World War II and during the Cold War. In The Visit, playwright Friedrich Dürrenmatt uses the immorality of the citizens of Güllen to represent societies worldwide. He shows this through Claire’s actions, the corruptness of authoritative figures, and the townspeople’s actions. Dürrenmatt uses the townspeople’s actions to parallel the immoralities that people in societies worldwide have. People lust over money because money …show more content…
The citizens all know that Alfred Ill will die eventually without knowing who will perform the murder, which is how the author shows that people in the real world are similar: people do not do things they are not directly responsible for. Another issue is people will go along with what will benefit them. In the case of the citizens of Güllen, they are letting Alfred Ill die for his money. The author also shows how people in societies worldwide make selfish decisions based on what solely benefits them and not others through the actions of the townspeople of Güllen. When Claire Zachanassian first introduces her bribe, the town of Güllen claims that they would not kill Alfred Ill. “‘Mrs. Zachanassian, we are still in Europe; we’re not savages yet. In the name of the town of Güllen I reject your offer’” (35). This quote is said by the mayor, but is expressed by all of the townspeople. Later in the novel, when the bribe is called upon the town to decide again, the town reacts in support for killing Alfred Ill. The townspeople exclaim that they are doing so in justice for Claire when they never claim anything of the …show more content…
People tend to listen to authoritative figures without questioning, which is problematic if the person in authority does questionable actions. In the case of the doctor, he claims a false autopsy by announcing, “ ‘heart attack.’ ” (109), while the mayor says, “ ‘died of joy’ ” (109), so that the media would not interpret the town of Güllen negatively. When the town decides upon choosing justice for Claire, most of the townspeople and the journalists leave the building. Alfred Ill, and some of the authoritative figures stay and kill Alfred Ill. The journalists come back in and the doctor claims it was a heart attack, while the mayor continues the lie. This shows how authoritative figures get involved in conspiracies to benefit themselves and portray themselves in good light, so that controversy does not arise. This happens in real life, mostly in politics and in business. Authoritative figures also tend to partake in wrongful actions, such as briberies. It can be seen with this following quote: “ ‘But wouldn’t it be your duty, as a man of honor, to face the facts and put an end to your life? If only for the sake of the community, out of love for your hometown’ ” (89). The mayor tries to persuade Alfred Ill to kill himself by saying it’s something a man of honor would do and by saying it is for the better good. When Alfred Ill claims that
The one example of this that I found most relevant in the book is the situation of Armando. Armando was shot and the bullet lodged in the spinal canal. It caused enough damage to make him a paraplegic, but not enough to kill him. The ethics committee had decided that it was best to encompass a DNR because he had no health insurance, and his quality of life was not what it was before. When the doctors went to approve this with Armando, he denied the DNR and said that he wanted what ever was necessary to be done to him to save his life (Belkin p. 58-59). This made Cindy worried for the cost of keeping him alive was substantial. All the doctors and caretakers believed that he should be placed under DNR, however that was not what Armando wanted. The doctors believed that was the wrong decision. This correlates to what the quote was from the book on page 70; doctors can tend to be narrow-minded when it comes to the care of a patient. They believe that their course of action is the best and do not agree if the patient wants something different. This I have found is also true in my own personal experience with doctors. For example, when I was about 17 my wisdom teeth were growing in. I was in terrible pan from two of my wisdom teeth being impacted. My
This novel depicts greed on several occasions through out the novel. One example of this is when Gatsby is left twenty five thousand dollars by Dan Cody as a legacy, but from what one is led to believe Ella Kaye refused to let
Although Charlie was a thirty seven year-old man, his understanding and comprehension of a situation was far too low to understand such consequences that the surgery could come with. In the article, "Five Steps to Better Ethical Decision Making", it says to ask yourself if you could understand making that choice (Dobrin). The doctors in "Flowers for Algernon" did not ask themselves if they were lacking as much intelligence as Charlie, could they make the choice to have the surgery? Charlie didn't know what could happen to him if the there were side effects until it was too late. Therefore, the doctors did not act ethically when choosing Charlie as the test
“Money moves the merchants all, While the tides shall ebb and flow, Money maketh evil show, Like the good and the truth like lies” (Lang 49).” The specified quotation clarifies that money supports the world to rotate but, also, it produces voracity and convinces the society that money is a great thing, when it is not. Lang creates stanza one by exemplifying money as something that can substantially convince a town, taking control of it. He writes that “money taketh town and wall” (1), denoting that money conquers a town and eventually seizes power. It can manage this by veiling itself as “Good” and “Truth”
“Corrupt” is defined as causing someone and or something to become immoral, dishonest, or dehumanized. In Lord of the Flies by William Golding and “I Only Came To Use the Phone” by Gabriel Garcia, corruption of authority is a theme reinforcing the main idea that humans instinctually understand that savagery is necessary for survival. Throughout both stories the reader gets a substantial perception of the immorality and dishonesty as the animalistic patterns that humans instinctually have represent what the authors are intending to display. The authors, Golding and Garcia, depict the message that when the characters holding the power are corrupt, then all of those around the power will be corrupted as the characters like all humans will instinctually become savage. The authors reinforce this theme by describing the details of the characters, setting, and objects around the corrupted authority in a pessimistic manner.
Through O’Connor’s religious background, the audience must closely analyze the true message of her story through her symbolism. Her shocking and grotesque ending of the short story challenges individuals by questioning what is good and what is evil. O’Connor’s symbolism found in her setting and main characters truly embody her view of modern society. She uses these elements as a representation for the realistic paths individuals struggle to choose between: the path involved in sin concerning money, good looks, and pride or the path towards God concerning morals, values, and respect for humanity.
Daniel Plainville is accurately represented through Buckle’s analysis as a man who personifies “greed” (1), and cockiness that shares a “hatred” (1) for everything but money and himself. This description of a money hungry man is evident through Plainville’s actions such as “risking his life seeking samples” of silver “in self-constructed chasms into the earth” (Buckle 1) with an injury to his leg caused by the explosion of a dynamite, and through his manipulations of individuals to gain power over land. Findings that lead to money and prosperity, such as oil and silver, in Pl...
...urther thinks, “people’s troubled relationship represents the effect of capitalism brought by industrialization in the town. I believe people care more about improving their financial status without caring about its effects on other people. For example, my father does not care about what I am going through provided he made money for the family”. Samsa finally supposes that his father’s hostility towards him show lack of appreciation for his money.
Anybody can write and persuade a certain audience, based on how the writer wants their audience to look at the situation. In Steve Earle’s essay “A Death in Texas”, he persuades his readers that he wants to believe that Johnathan Wayne Nobles was rehabilitated. In the essay, Nobles was a changed man within faith from becoming a religious man within the prison walls. Prison guards learned to trust Nobles with his quick-witted charm and friendliness. Steve persuaded himself that Johnathan was a changed man from the words that they had exchanged over the years on paper. Reality states that no matter how much someone changed in the present, it doesn’t change what they have done in the past. Earle describes in the essay “There he will be pumped full of chemicals that will collapse his lungs and stop his heart forever” (Earle 73). He’s persuading the audience with horrid emotion with facts of a lethal injection that will happen to Johnathan. What Earle doesn’t describe is how gruesomely Johnathan’s murders were. In this world everyone has a chance to know right from wrong, even if someone was brought up wrong in the society. Johnathan was not rehabilitated, maybe at one point accepted his past, but he was still a murderer and a
The minister, Reverend Parris, is an excellent example of greed. Reverend Parris says, “Man don’t a minister deserve a house to live in” (Miller 1250). Reverend Parris is the minister of Salem and should be happy and satisfied with what he has. However, he is describing how he believes that because he is the minister, he should have a better house to live in. Reverend Parris also shows another example of greed in the play by saying, “I am paid little enough without I spend six pound on firewood” (Miller 1250). In this quote, the Reverend is complaining about how little he is paid for being the town minister. Again, he thinks that he should get the firewood without paying for it because of who he is. Reverend Par...
As shown in literature, corruption and the abuse of power is an ongoing discussion. When it comes down to the point where people are being used and abused physically and psychologically, it creates a hostile environment for both the subjects and the abuser. As represented in the two similar texts Lord Of the Flies and “I Only Came to use the Phone”, corrupted authority and abuse of power usually end up leading to the collapse of a society or a world of chaos and violence.
In Red Harvest, in both his description of both “Poisonville” and it’s inhabitants, Hammett uses contradicting language, and often iconic reoccurring imagery to express the deterioration of American morals with the growth of underground crime, judicial politics, and the emergence of the femme fatal. The characters in the novel, including the operative himself are willing to lie, cheat, and kill in cold blood for their own personal gain. Although infidelity, greed, and self-preservation are expected from characters involved with the murders and inner crime ring; the story becomes more complicated when characters like the operative, and chief of police begin to get their hands dirty. Bringing the age-old crime ad punishment theme to a higher tier where the reader is unable to make an impulsive decision on who is a “bad guy”, and who is a “good guy”.
The author demonstrates how one can lose sight in life and become corrupt through focusing only on wealth, supremacy and materialistic possessions
Deeper down, however, the author demonstrated that sometimes when one does not conform to the social norm, but rather follows his own desires, they potentially cause a shift in the norm. Although it may have undesired consequences for the person in the short term, there may be benefits to society in the long run. It is through individuals following their own desires that society can be shaped. Shakespeare displayed this motif when the protagonist attended the Capulet ball, married Juliet, and when he killed Tybalt. The author demonstrates that when one commits an act of non-conformance, others will inevitably follow, though they may cause further repercussions. As these repercussions accumulate, it requires a change in the societal norm to eradicate
eyes reveals that people cared more about money and material things than their values and