Cutting Art In Schools Essay

1238 Words3 Pages

Students who study art are 4 times more likely to be recognized for academic achievement and 3 times more likely to be awarded for school attendance. Cool fact right? Schools cutting art along with music programs is a problem that is all too real. When schools cut art programs they are also cutting the skills that could very well improve the students. The benefits and the entertainment that they all could have had are gone as well. Cutting those “unnecessary” classes are really hurting the future generations. Although, with huge benefits, massive effects of cuts, as well as the overall entertainment, it is clear that art and music programs should stay in schools. Furthermore, let us learn about the great benefits of keeping the art/music programs in school! …show more content…

That they are a waste of time, that they could be having more time with other more “important” things ("Should we cut the fine arts in public education?"). However this is not true, at all really. Even without art you probably would not have time to do those more important things with your time. You have homework? That’s whats study hall is for. You don’t have to remove art from the picture just so you can have more of what you want, even if having more than one study hall sounds great. People may also believe that removing these programs gives them more time to focus on the core subjects, so they can do better on standardized tests. Nope, wrong again. Aforementioned, art helps tremendously with these tests, and taking them away would probably only hurt more than help. Another reason that people may think that cutting art from the schools is a good thing, is because they think that it cost too much. When in reality, I don't see how it could. Have you ever been to an art class? The students are required to bring in their own art box, and that isn't even expensive either. These reasons should eliminate any thought on keeping art and music in

Open Document