Currie's Leadership

1137 Words3 Pages

The Rise of a Hero World War 1 was unlike anything that was expected from the previous wars fought. Besides the sheer amount of combatants, the advent of technology resulted in a “trench warfare”; a battle fought with powerful weapons, destructive environments, and deadly surprises. Expecting beautiful lands and a promising new experience, thousands of soldiers were instead met with unimaginable amounts of grief and sorrow. As a result of this, experienced tacticians who could navigate the battlefield and direct their soldiers became an absolute necessity. While the Canadian Corps were small, they were home to talented and promising young soldiers from all walks of life, and Sir Arthur Currie was no exception to this. While he was a lowly …show more content…

Currie proved that he was capable of becoming a leader by due to his vast amount of prior knowledge on the battlefield. Due to this, he was then promoted to a position of leadership, and Arthur chose to lead his soldiers as an authoritarian. He chose this leadership as his orders were of utmost importance; since his plans would result in huge victories for the Allies. This was heavily reinforced during the battle of Vimy Ridge, where his intricately engineered plan resulted in victory for the Canadian army. In fact, the strategy was so innovative that it was adopted by the rest of the Allied Forces for the duration of the war. Furthermore, the harsh autocratic leadership style Arthur enforced meant that his soldiers were severely reprimanded if they disobeyed his orders. As a result of this, the soldiers showed a general disliking towards him. However, his determination to lead the Canadian army to victory inspired others to listen to his orders and advice. Likewise, after Currie received the complete control of the Canadian army after the Battle of Vimy Ridge, he became much more blunt and demanding with his orders. While it initially seemed as if he was corrupt and power hungry, his actions resulted in the salvation of his soldiers’ lives. Therefore, while he may have used a very extreme version of the autocratic leadership style, Arthur’s

Open Document