Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cultural relativism philosophy
Cultural relativism philosophy
Cultural relativism philosophy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cultural relativism philosophy
Introduction The case study on cultural relativism and western medical practice focuses on the healing practices that differ from one culture to the next, and how medical practitioners should tolerate these different approaches that can be viewed as unethical to western society medical practices. Ms. S, an immigrant from Laos brought her infant in for her four-month immunizations to the physician. Dr. Leigh’s, the working physician notices the red and quarter-inch round markings on the babies’ abdomen. Dr Leigh is informed that Ms. S’s daughter has an illness and the markings are in result of pain-induced method with intent to cure the illness. A method involving intentional pain, specifically dropping hot fat drops, leading to blisters, a …show more content…
S Mother in law, Marie, Ms.S Husband, Ms.S other children, Dr. Leigh
4) Situational
Le Mien Culture states that this is justifiable. Dr. Leigh seems apprehensive about this situation as in the Le Mien culture this medical practice is a norm, and conflicts with western medical practices as the child is being physically harmed. Even though it is not considered child abuse in Ms.S culture, it is in the western society where the issue is occurring. Is it honest to not tell authorities, and to be empathetic to Marie. As a doctor she should report it as a duty.
5) External
Ms. S is still relatively new to United States and may not realize that behaviour isn’t acceptable, as she is very open about her practice and the method to cure the illness that it becomes evident she considers this behavior as justifiable. This may be all Mr. S knows as the cultural she has grown up in was surrounded by an environment where this practice is a routine. Politically, as a law, this is causing harm to the baby, is child abuse and should be reported. Societal views, such as social contrast/ laws of civil society views this behaviour is intolerable and when safety interferes with cultural norms, this norm should be
…show more content…
D’s daughter outweighs the benefits of being cured from this disease, furthermore not reporting this innocent can lead to greater harm. From a deontological view, Dr. Leigh has the duty as a physician and registered professional to report this to authorities. She feels as though she has conflicting duties, as based on her patients culture this traditional method to cure her daughter is right, but for western society it is wrong. By law it is abuse even though it’s a culture norm. Based on social contrast, laws of civil society, in western society one cannot doing this to child. It is considered child abuse, as the child’s autonomy is not respected because the infant is too young to have a say. In this case, Dr. Leigh followed her followed her intuition to not tell
“Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see”—Mark Twain. Health care is a profession that should epitomize kindness. Cultural competence, being open-minded to other cultures, is essential for effective and kind healthcare in our current multicultural population. This case analysis will examine the ethical dilemmas, moral theories, principles, alternative actions, and give a recommendation about the morally best action for the case “Confronting a fetal abnormality” by Karen Peterson-Iyer.
To begin with, there is Autonomy with Lora wanting to make the choice on not having the abuse she encountered be reported. Secondly, Beneficence is present with the nurse wanting to do good by doing what is best for the patient, preventing further abuse, and getting Lora out of the environment she is in. Morally, the nurse wants to keep Lora’s abuse private and confidential per Lora’s wishes, but legally the nurse is required by law to report the abuse no matter what age the child is. Nonmaleficence is present in that the nurse must consider the pain in suffering the patient and family will encounter when this is reported resulting in Lora being removed from everything that is familiar to her with the end result of getting Lora out of the abuse and into a healthy environment. The nurse has to be truthful to Lora and explain why the nurse will report the abuse and what the process will be which pertains to the principle of Veracity. The nurse must keep the information that was given about the abuse confidential by only telling the appropriate agency or those in a need to know basis that will deal with the abuse. This is one of the few times that the nurse will go against the patient’s wishes of privacy due to the vulnerability principle. This occurs when there is a need for protection for
... child, but that is not always the case. When it comes to the health of the baby, whose at fault? Is the parents the ones that caused the health problem, or is it the doctors fault for not taking the extra measures to insure the safety of the child. When the health and the safety of the child is involved everyone wants to blame everyone, but who is really at fault? Do doctors have the right to disclose information from their patients? Doctors have a duty to give the information to their patients whether it is good or bad. Doctors should not have the right to withhold information from any of their patients. A doctor should have to tell their patients all the information they know specially when it comes to their unborn child. The health and the information about their child should be told to the parents so they can make the decision that they feel would be best.
In his short story “The Use of Force,” Williams Carlos Williams puts a bad taste in your mouth about how the doctor acts towards the little girl known as Mathilda. He actively grasps her jaw, holds her down, and ends up making her mouth bleed. When people read this story for the first time, they could see the doctor as a cruel person who does not care for the well-being of children, or even that he does not like children and wants to hurt them. However, I believe that the doctor is justified in his actions of force and should be commended for his successful diagnosis.
I have come to fully understand that in order to treat my patients in a way that is person centred, I have to treat each person as an individual and realise that every individual has different needs and different rights and preferences to me which may go against my morals and beliefs but I always have to maintain my professional boundaries and treat each individual with respect and dignity. If I was a nurse who witnessed a similar situation to Kat’s, where another healthcare professional was disregarding my patient or any patients views or requests I would go into the patient’s room and find out what the problem was. Then I would politely ask the healthcare professional to step outside of the room and I would gently remind them of the code of ethics ((Kozier, Erb's & Berman, 2010, p.97) and the Registered Nurses standards of practise (2016), and how every individual has the right to make their own independent decisions about their healthcare needs/goals based on their own values, morals and beliefs. I would further explain that the patients are our main priority and it is our responsibility as nurses’ to ensure that the patients are safe and are receiving the proper care. I would then explain to the patient what was happening and apologise to them about the situation, and I would rearrange and try to negotiate with the patient when the procedure could be performed. Then I would notify the Nurse Unit Manager on the ward to ensure that situations like this do not occur
With the guidance of their physician, Baby Does’ parents chose to withhold medical care and surgery due to the conclusion still leaving the child with severe retardation. “Officials at the hospital had the Indiana Juvenile Courts appoint a guardian to determine whether or not to perform the surgery. The court finally ruled in favor of the parents and upheld their right to informed medical decision” (Resnik, 2011). Because of the decision made to withhold surgery and medical care, Baby Doe died five days later of dehydration and pneumonia.
The Challenge of Culture Relativism written by James Rachels argues the downsides and upsides to the idea of Cultural Relativism. This is the idea of Cultural Relativism: the principle that an individual human 's beliefs and activities should be understood by others in terms of that individual 's own culture. It was established as axiomatic in anthropological research by Franz Boas in the first few decades of the 20th century and later popularized by his students.
"Under traditional principles of criminal law the omission of ordinary care by parents, physicians and nurses creates criminal liability. The crimes committed may include murder, involuntary manslaughter, conspiracy and child abuse or neglect. Generally a person is criminally liable for homicide by omission if: 1) He has a legal duty to protect another; 2) with knowledge or gross negligence he fails to act; 3) and such failure proximately causes the death of the other.
an 11 year old incest victim was assumed even with risks because Dr. Robinson knew if
When it comes to anthropological theories, it is hard to prove or disprove them because everyone has different experiences in their lives within their different cultures that contribute to their opinion on that theory. I believe this is true with the theory of cultural relativism. My experiences within my own culture and the beliefs of my culture have led me to both agree and disagree with different aspects, or lack thereof, of cultural relativism. I believe there exists a duality within the theory of cultural relativism, a duality that I am familiar with and that has become a significant part of my culture. I am from the Twin Cities in Minnesota. The “Twin Cities” refers to Minneapolis and St. Paul. Only divided by a river (or in some cases, just a street), these cities are of equal, yet different importance in Minnesota culture. My experiences spending time in the two cities have led me to live in duel cultures. While many people live in a duality of cultures through their ethnicity, I identify with duel cultures based on geography. My experiences in both Minneapolis and St. Paul contribute to my ambivalence regarding cultural relativism. In Anthropology, there is a gray area when it comes to generalizing about cultures, because we all come from different ones. The idea of duality is a familiar one with which I can apply to my own life and my own culture, as well as to the well-known anthropological theory that tries to find an answer to the question of what culture is.
Morality, according to Socrates, is about “how we ought to live” and why. Cultural Relativism is one among numerous disputed theories which has attempted to expand upon Socrates uncomplicated definition (Rachels Elements of Moral Philosophy 1). This theory is unique in its five basic claims. The theories basic claims contain weaknesses, strengths and unsound argument.
Cultural relativism is the idea that moral and ethical systems varying from culture to culture, are all equally credible and no one system is morally greater than any other. Cultural relativism is based on the concept that there is no “ultimate” standard of good and evil, so the judgement of what is seen as moral, or immoral, is simply a product of one’s society and/or culture. The general consensus of this view is that there is no ethical position that may be considered “right” or “wrong” in terms of society and culture (Cultural Relativism). In this paper I will argue that cultural relativism is not an adequate view of morality by providing evidence of its most common logical problems and faulty reasoning.
o There is also a conflict between the parents and themselves/the doctor. They want to go along with the doctor because they know he must check, but they do not want force or hurt their daughter in order to get her to submit.
Ethics is defined as a study that deals with what behavior is considered to be, good or bad. Ethics is about doing what is right for other people throughout society (Kraft). Ethical principles result from religions, philosophies, and cultural ideas. The world is changing and so is everything in it, judgments about what is ethically right and wrong are also changing. Ethical relativism is important within society, along with utilitarianism, deontology, virtue-based ethics, and ethical principles of healthcare.
...e upon a painful treatment the child is in no position to tell them otherwise. “According to a traditional Confucian interpretation, a child who agrees to a parent’s refusal of treatment would be violating the principle of filial piety” (Bowman). This makes the children very inactive in their own situation’s outcome. Therefore children and doctors do not have a very direct relationship and the communication is left to be between the older people of the patient’s family and the doctor resulting in a more technically based and advanced language.