Criticism Of Invisibility In Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man

629 Words2 Pages

Invisible Man, a book by Ralph Ellison was notably one of the most influential novels of its time. The novel unveils the barriers and inequalities Black people faced in the community, politics, education institutions and economics alike during the early 1900’s. Many critics have argued that the narrative can’t be categorized as a protest fiction because Ellison is an advocate for “invisibility” rather than direct political action. However, according to Webster Dictionary, the definition of protest is the act of publically objecting or showing disapproval of something. This means that a protest novel can’t be limited to the demonstration of direct political action. Invisibility does act as a form of criticism that adds to the overall functionality …show more content…

The novel tells the story of a Black man in his twenties who remains nameless throughout the novel. He simply refers to himself as an “Invisible Man.” In the opening of the novel, he states, “I am an invisible man. No, I am not a spook like those who haunted Edgar Allan Poe; nor am I one of your Hollywood-movie ectoplasms. I am a man of substance, of flesh and bone, fiber and liquids—and I might even be said to possess a mind. I am invisible, understand, simply because people refuse to see me” (Ellison 3). The narrator explains that his “invisibility” is a result of oppressors basically overlooking him. He implies that racists don’t see him for who he truly is, only for his blackness. Instead of being seen as an actual person, people assume they know who he is by projecting general stereotypes onto him instead of taking the time out to personally find out. This idea is closely related to W. E. B. Du Bois’ (1903) concept of “the veil” which is a metaphor that describes the invisible color line between Black and White Americans. This “veil” also is the reason White people fail to see their Black counterparts as actual

Open Document