Critical Analysis of Jeremy Clarkson’s work

1188 Words3 Pages

Critical Analysis of Jeremy Clarkson’s work

The two pieces of journalism chosen for this analysis are Jeremy

Clarkson’s report on a short visit to Iraq 18 months on from the

supposed end of the war there in 2003, and John Pilger’s article

concerning his arrival in, and initial experience of, Saigon during

the Vietnam war in 1966. These two reports, and reporters, make a

handy comparison.

Although Jeremy Clarkson is viewed principally as motoring journalist

he has the ability to adapt his journalistic skills to a range of

subjects, some far removed from cars. For his motoring column in the

Sunday Times Clarkson’s style is humorous bordering on sarcasm, which

works well and this style translates well to the subject of the

controversial war in Iraq. The Sunday Times is a quality broadsheet

newspaper aimed at the upper end of Britain’s readership and is a

market leader with an average Sunday sale of 1,395,046 copies, which

represents a 50.58% share of this area of the market. Clarkson, being

an out and out Conservative, is immediately identifiable with the

readership of the Sunday Times, and his ‘overgrown schoolboy’ approach

presents as a welcome relief amongst the principally serious

editorials of the papers other journalists. In ‘Behind Jeremy Lines’

the situation in Iraq is revealed as totally opposite to what the

politicians would have us believe, this is made apparent in the title

of the article. Behind the lines in a military sense and behind the

lines of what is being reported. Clarkson takes the opportunity here

to ‘bash’ two of his pet hatreds, Blair’s Labour Party and the Bush

administration of the U. S.A. The article is ...

... middle of paper ...

...bines with deliberate

simplification, such as his description of how the KIA bureau performs

its tasks, to “bring the report home” in the readers mind.

Clarkson’s dynamism and Pilger’s sober approach seem to be absolutely

correct to the relevant situations to which they are related, and in

that sense they have worked well. Clarkson does not make the ideal war

correspondent, but manages to still succeed because he makes his

report interesting to read, which is precisely what needs to be

achieved, Pilger’s report pulls on the mind and promotes deep thought,

therefore what is being reported transfers to the reader. The outcome

is that, although these are two differing styles of journalism, both

styles achieve their aim by making the reports readable and

interesting, the whole point of journalism is in this way achieved.

Open Document