Critical Analysis Of 'The Potato Famine' By Jonathan Swift

1640 Words4 Pages

In a time of trouble, Ireland was desperate for solutions. The Potato Famine left many families in search of a way to preserve their land, lives, and families. While numerous people looked for feasible ways to solve their problem, Jonathan Swift decided to write about it. His writing however, did not provide a solution people would be willing to carry out. Swift’s approach was to show the people of Ireland just how absurd their predicament was. His main focus in his essay was the landlords and the English. He believed the landlords had so much control that families may as well sign their children over to them, because they would never be able to pay off debts owed. Swift also had a problem with English government and its rule over Ireland. …show more content…

A Modest Proposal is undoubtedly one of the most recognized works of satire. This essay was designed to shock its readers in Ireland. Swift’s goal was to show the people of Ireland just how ridiculous their situation during the famine was. He also showed a great deal of disgust in relation to control. Swift was displeased with England’s control over his country, and how the dominance was being used. However, he showed a greater level of disgust with his own people. This is exemplified when another author writes about A Modest Proposal that

The aptness of the symbolism to English mismanagement is patent the system of absentee landlordism and economic deprivation was another form of cannibalism.

The author of this article is putting in perspective how Swift felt about the problems in Ireland were being solved. They believe that the very design of the Irish system of owing money could be considered another type of cannibalism because of all the power and control one obtained.

Swift’s proposal was anything but modest. However, his intended audience did not receive the message. The idea of raising children to eat them was so absurd that the majority of people could not see past it. The author of the quote even goes as far as to connect different problems back to the idea of cannibalism. Landlords’ control over their tenants was so …show more content…

In his essay A Modest Proposal the author uses perhaps the most extreme idea he could think of. While it was done with good intentions, its interpretation was lost in the shock value. The majority of people over looked his writing, refusing to take it seriously enough to look at the message being conveyed. Perhaps a better approach would have been to not be so extreme and graphic in his proposal. In its relation to Baum’s Wizard of Oz, they don’t share many ideals. For example, Baum’s story is that of good winning over evil. Each character digs deep enough to accomplish something that amounts to success in their eyes. Baum gives the illusion that he believes in human nature. In contrast, Swift’s essay is an example of limitations, or a lack thereof. He portrays an idea that in his perspective is only one step away from happening. Swift’s essay connects the literal meaning of cannibalism with the sense that the upper class and England are consuming the lower classes’ lives, money, and families. One way the stories relate is in how they came to a resolution. In the Wizard of Oz, the Wicked Witch of the West was killed. The way in which she was ended also has a meaning of its own: sometimes the answer is right in front of you. A Modest Proposal presents a similar solution. The stories correlate in the answers they give. Swift’s essay also uses death as a solution to Ireland’s problem. While his is on a more

Open Document