Critical Analysis Of The Communist Manifesto

1432 Words3 Pages

The second section of The Communist Manifesto is the section in which Karl Marx attempts to offer rebuttals to popular criticisms of his theory of governance. These explanations are based upon the supposition that capitalists cannot make informed observations upon communism as they are unable to look past their capitalist upbringing and that capitalists only seek to exploit others. Though the logic behind these suppositions are flawed, Marx does make some valid points concerning the uprising of the proletariat.
Marx outlines the goals that the Marxists should strive toward. He states that they do not form a separate party from the other working class parties and serves only to protect the interests of the proletariat. Marx states that the only differences between the Communist party and other working class parties are that Communists serve the proletariat regardless of nationality and that Communists must always represent the movement as a whole. This way, Communists are the most driven of the working class parties because they have a clearly defined goal and standard operating procedure. This goal is the same as all other proletariat parties, as Marx …show more content…

He answers criticisms with only one possible route of action and one possible outcome. In his mind, a communist society would easily become a utopia. However, a look at the countries in the world today who attempted communism will shows failures across the board. Those among the proletariat who rose up to lead the rest against the bourgeoisie became the leaders of the countries and enjoy the same decadence and superiority that they sought to abolish. Soviet Russia under Joseph Stalin was a bloodbath. Mao’s Red China was a hotbed of human rights violations. Cuba under Castro was a system of corruption. All were absolute dictatorships in which the proletariat had no say, the same as

Open Document