Critical Analysis Of Ethical Blindness

Unit I In the article "Ethical Blindness", the writers examine how sometimes choices are frequently made without the individual notwithstanding knowing about it. The choices can be a consequence of an association between individual qualities of the person and attributes of the circumstance. Most research on ethical decision making still expands on the suspicion that choices are made by reasonable people. The rationality presumption is shown different ways. The traditionally moral logic, business ethicists more often than not expect that there is an ethical perspective from which ethicality of a choice can be assessed. It is comprehended that the ethical perspective can be translated in an unexpected way, contingent upon the particular background philosophy, yet they share the presumption that there is a target and unprejudiced line that individuals can use to measure contentions and achieve an answer. An example of this would be that some managers use different philosophical lenses when making a decision – reflecting

As a consequence, the ethical dimension of a decision is not necessarily visible to the decision maker. A person can behave unethically and not even realize that they are behaving that way. They could be thinking that they are doing things appropriately. It is only later that they realize the unethical dimension of their decision. This is what the authors describe as ethical blindness. Under certain circumstances the ethical aspect of a decision fades away so that the decision maker gradually becomes unaware of it (Palazzo, Krings, & Hoffrage,